Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/AndyMik90/Aperant/vs/CherryHQ/cherry-studio Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/AndyMik90/Aperant/vs/CherryHQ/cherry-studio.md Description: Aperant and cherry-studio share 21 technologies: Vite, React, SQLite, Anthropic, OpenAI, Sentry, MCP, Electron, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, Radix UI, dnd-kit, motion, TanStack, Lucide, ai, ai-sdk, OpenRouter, remark-gfm, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript. # Aperant vs cherry-studio Aperant and cherry-studio share 21 technologies: Vite, React, SQLite, Anthropic, OpenAI, Sentry, MCP, Electron, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, Radix UI, dnd-kit, motion, TanStack, Lucide, ai, ai-sdk, OpenRouter, remark-gfm, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript. - [AndyMik90/Aperant](https://seerepo.com/r/AndyMik90/Aperant): Autonomous multi-session AI coding - [CherryHQ/cherry-studio](https://seerepo.com/r/CherryHQ/cherry-studio): Your AI workspace for models, agents, and productivity. ## What they share and what sets them apart - In common: Vite, React, SQLite, Anthropic, OpenAI, Sentry, MCP, Electron, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, Radix UI, dnd-kit, motion, TanStack, Lucide, ai, ai-sdk, OpenRouter, remark-gfm, Zod - Only in Aperant: xterm, @tavily/core, react-markdown, rehype-raw, rehype-sanitize, electron-log - Only in cherry-studio: lru-cache, dexie, electron-store, @aws-sdk/lib-storage, sqlite-vec, elysia, @electron-toolkit/preload, quickjs-wasi, grammy, quick-lru, PostCSS, tiptap, React Hook Form, react-spinners, @tanstack/react-virtual, react-hotkeys-hook, react-error-boundary, echarts, @uiw/react-codemirror, xyflow, @floating-ui/dom, virtua, emoji-picker-react, @dagrejs/dagre, @pierre/highlights, @react-aria/live-announcer, ansi-to-react, CodeMirror, react-player, Drizzle, earendil-works, tesseract.js, ollama-ai-provider-v2, partial-json, gpt-tokenizer, unified, streamdown, file-type, unist-util-visit, remark-parse, sharp, yaml, markdown-it, qrcode.react, turndown, @firecrawl/anydoc, dompurify, htmlparser2, @napi-rs/canvas, katex, officeparser, remove-markdown, @mozilla/readability, @tiptap/markdown, Cheerio, docx, fast-xml-parser, gray-matter, html-to-image, html-to-text, mdast-util-from-markdown, mediabunny, micromark-util-types, pdf-lib, pdf-parse, pdfjs-dist, qrcode, remark-math, remark-stringify, word-extractor, @hookform/resolvers, opentelemetry, winston, winston-daily-rotate-file, @earendil-works/pi-ai, @aiden0z/pptx-renderer, docx-preview, exceljs, @ai-sdk/provider-utils, uiw, @lezer/highlight, cmdk, react-day-picker, react-dropzone, react-resizable-panels, vaul, rehype-parse, rehype-stringify, remark-github-blockquote-alert ## Side by side | | Aperant | cherry-studio | |---|---|---| | Size | 317,392 lines written, 912 code files | 1,744,076 lines written, 6,114 code files | | Who writes it | 63.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Factory, and CodeRabbit | 11.8% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Factory, Jules, Amp, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, and Codex | | Activity | Last push June 14, 2026, 1,025 commits, 14,597 stars | Last push November 5, 2026, 9,918 commits, 53,285 stars | | Tests | 232 test files. 24.6% of its code files have a test that imports them | 3,190 test files. 47.1% of its code files have a test that imports them | - Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests. - Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch. - Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it. - Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports. ## Frequently asked questions ### Which is bigger, Aperant or cherry-studio? cherry-studio, with 1,744,076 lines written; Aperant has 317,392. The proof: [CherryHQ/cherry-studio's code at commit 2292fdd](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/tree/2292fdd739266df12518e4f706de1aa99f66015f) ### Which has more GitHub stars, Aperant or cherry-studio? cherry-studio, with 53,285 stars; Aperant has 14,597. The proof: [CherryHQ/cherry-studio on GitHub](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio) ### Which has more tests, Aperant or cherry-studio? cherry-studio, with 3,190 test files; Aperant has 232. The proof: [CherryHQ/cherry-studio's code at commit 2292fdd](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/tree/2292fdd739266df12518e4f706de1aa99f66015f) ### Which was updated more recently, Aperant or cherry-studio? cherry-studio: its last push was on November 5, 2026, and Aperant's on June 14, 2026. The proof: [CherryHQ/cherry-studio's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/commits) ### Which has more commits signed by AI, Aperant or cherry-studio? Aperant: an AI signed 63.3% of its commits, with Claude Code, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Factory, and CodeRabbit; in cherry-studio, 11.8%. The proof: [the commits each tool signed in AndyMik90/Aperant](https://seerepo.com/r/AndyMik90/Aperant/ai) ## Sources - AndyMik90/Aperant: Read on November 9, 2026, at commit 20250db (https://github.com/AndyMik90/Aperant/tree/20250db069a849ab001ac6ab9e3e9779886ab9e2) - CherryHQ/cherry-studio: Read on November 5, 2026, at commit 2292fdd (https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/tree/2292fdd739266df12518e4f706de1aa99f66015f) ## What is your repo built with? Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.