Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/BerriAI/litellm/vs/open-jarvis/OpenJarvis
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/BerriAI/litellm/vs/open-jarvis/OpenJarvis.md
Description: litellm and OpenJarvis share 17 technologies: FastAPI, rusqlite, SQLite, OpenAI, Tokio, React, Anthropic, schemars, tracing, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Base UI, recharts, sonner, Lucide, react-markdown, and remark-gfm. Both are written in Python.

# litellm vs OpenJarvis

litellm and OpenJarvis share 17 technologies: FastAPI, rusqlite, SQLite, OpenAI, Tokio, React, Anthropic, schemars, tracing, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Base UI, recharts, sonner, Lucide, react-markdown, and remark-gfm. Both are written in Python.

- [BerriAI/litellm](https://seerepo.com/r/BerriAI/litellm): The fastest, litest AI Gateway. Rust core with Python SDK. Call 100+ LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format with cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging [Bedrock, Azure, OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenAI, VertexAI, vLLM, Nvidia NIM]
- [open-jarvis/OpenJarvis](https://seerepo.com/r/open-jarvis/OpenJarvis): Personal AI, On Personal Devices

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: FastAPI, rusqlite, SQLite, OpenAI, Tokio, React, Anthropic, schemars, tracing, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Base UI, recharts, sonner, Lucide, react-markdown, remark-gfm
- Only in litellm: Flask, axum, tower, aws-sdk-s3, psycopg, sqlx-postgres, sqlx, Postgres, moka, Redis, azure_storage_blob, Claude, Qdrant, anyio, AIOHTTP, Next.js, jsonwebtoken, aws-sdk-sts, azure_identity, gcp_auth, litellm, rmcp, tokenizers, tiktoken, tiktoken-rs, jinja2, zip, Pydantic, jsonschema, boto3, azure_core, aws-sdk-secretsmanager, tracing-subscriber, next-themes, tanstack, React Hook Form, react-syntax-highlighter, react-copy-to-clipboard, react-hotkeys-hook, usehooks-ts, @shadcn/react, cmdk, ProseMirror, prosemirror-state, prosemirror-view, react-json-view-lite, react-resizable-panels, @heroicons/react, jwt-decode, papaparse, Zod, @hookform/resolvers
- Only in OpenJarvis: PostHog, Vite, @tauri-apps/api, React Router, Tauri, Rich, ed25519-dalek, datasets, psutil, tailwind-merge, motion, tauri-plugin-dialog, tauri-plugin-notification, keyring, katex, rehype-highlight, rehype-katex, remark-math, tauri-apps, qrcode-terminal

## Side by side

| | litellm | OpenJarvis |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 4,586,231 lines written, 5,606 code files | 387,411 lines written, 741 code files |
| Who writes it | 20.1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Devin, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, OpenHands, Codex, Aider, and Gemini CLI | 44.5% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor |
| Activity | Last push November 5, 2026, 46,240 commits, 62,741 stars | Last push November 9, 2026, 1,216 commits, 14,043 stars |
| Tests | 6,918 test files. 22% of its code files have a test that imports them | 759 test files. 62.5% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, litellm or OpenJarvis?

litellm, with 4,586,231 lines written; OpenJarvis has 387,411.

The proof: [BerriAI/litellm's code at commit 7e4ad6e](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/tree/7e4ad6eb333071d67c2eb03ce6468f89a0855027)

### Which has more GitHub stars, litellm or OpenJarvis?

litellm, with 62,741 stars; OpenJarvis has 14,043.

The proof: [BerriAI/litellm on GitHub](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm)

### Which has more tests, litellm or OpenJarvis?

litellm, with 6,918 test files; OpenJarvis has 759.

The proof: [BerriAI/litellm's code at commit 7e4ad6e](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/tree/7e4ad6eb333071d67c2eb03ce6468f89a0855027)

### Which was updated more recently, litellm or OpenJarvis?

OpenJarvis: its last push was on November 9, 2026, and litellm's on November 5, 2026.

The proof: [open-jarvis/OpenJarvis's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/open-jarvis/OpenJarvis/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, litellm or OpenJarvis?

OpenJarvis: an AI signed 44.5% of its commits, with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor; in litellm, 20.1%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in open-jarvis/OpenJarvis](https://seerepo.com/r/open-jarvis/OpenJarvis/ai)

## Sources

- BerriAI/litellm: Read on November 5, 2026, at commit 7e4ad6e (https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/tree/7e4ad6eb333071d67c2eb03ce6468f89a0855027)
- open-jarvis/OpenJarvis: Read on November 9, 2026, at commit a4aa027 (https://github.com/open-jarvis/OpenJarvis/tree/a4aa0271dd1479ef547d24cf69a62e0e8307d22c)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.