Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/Nozbe/WatermelonDB/vs/videojs/video.js
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/Nozbe/WatermelonDB/vs/videojs/video.js.md
Description: WatermelonDB and video.js share 3 technologies: React, react-android, and react-native. WatermelonDB is written in C and video.js in TypeScript.

# WatermelonDB vs video.js

WatermelonDB and video.js share 3 technologies: React, react-android, and react-native. WatermelonDB is written in C and video.js in TypeScript.

- [Nozbe/WatermelonDB](https://seerepo.com/r/Nozbe/WatermelonDB): 🍉 Reactive & asynchronous database for powerful React and React Native apps ⚡️
- [videojs/video.js](https://seerepo.com/r/videojs/video.js): Video.js v10 - open source media player framework for HTML and React.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: React, react-android, react-native
- Only in WatermelonDB: SQLite, hermes-android, JetBrains, appcompat
- Only in video.js: Vite, shaka-player, cn, class-variance-authority, Base UI, @heroicons/react, Tailwind CSS, lightningcss, @tailwindcss/node, shadcn

## Side by side

| | WatermelonDB | video.js |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 84,907 lines written, 2,964 code files | 376,360 lines written, 2,211 code files |
| Who writes it | 0% of its commits signed by AI | 8.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot |
| Activity | Last push September 16, 2026, 3,820 commits, 11,800 stars | Last push November 6, 2026, 5,686 commits, 40,096 stars |
| Tests | 45 test files. 0.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | 755 test files. 36.5% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, WatermelonDB or video.js?

video.js, with 376,360 lines written; WatermelonDB has 84,907.

The proof: [videojs/video.js's code at commit 2c88e68](https://github.com/videojs/video.js/tree/2c88e684c8ecd2efe5aa67905daf1b1bc4dbb232)

### Which has more GitHub stars, WatermelonDB or video.js?

video.js, with 40,096 stars; WatermelonDB has 11,800.

The proof: [videojs/video.js on GitHub](https://github.com/videojs/video.js)

### Which has more tests, WatermelonDB or video.js?

video.js, with 755 test files; WatermelonDB has 45.

The proof: [videojs/video.js's code at commit 2c88e68](https://github.com/videojs/video.js/tree/2c88e684c8ecd2efe5aa67905daf1b1bc4dbb232)

### Which was updated more recently, WatermelonDB or video.js?

video.js: its last push was on November 6, 2026, and WatermelonDB's on September 16, 2026.

The proof: [videojs/video.js's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/videojs/video.js/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, WatermelonDB or video.js?

video.js: an AI signed 8.7% of its commits, with Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in videojs/video.js](https://seerepo.com/r/videojs/video.js/ai)

## Sources

- Nozbe/WatermelonDB: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit 5c46322 (https://github.com/Nozbe/WatermelonDB/tree/5c463222ecd79928861385bac94b486fcc7623d4)
- videojs/video.js: Read on November 6, 2026, at commit 2c88e68 (https://github.com/videojs/video.js/tree/2c88e684c8ecd2efe5aa67905daf1b1bc4dbb232)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.