Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/vs/TauricResearch/TradingAgents
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/vs/TauricResearch/TradingAgents.md
Description: AutoGPT and TradingAgents share 3 technologies: Rich, cryptography, and markdown-it-py. Both are written in Python.

# AutoGPT vs TradingAgents

AutoGPT and TradingAgents share 3 technologies: Rich, cryptography, and markdown-it-py. Both are written in Python.

- [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT](https://seerepo.com/r/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT): AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters.
- [TauricResearch/TradingAgents](https://seerepo.com/r/TauricResearch/TradingAgents): TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Rich, cryptography, markdown-it-py
- Only in AutoGPT: FastAPI, uvicorn, hypercorn, psycopg2-binary, pymssql, pymysql, graphiti-core, Redis, gcloud-aio-storage, pika, falkordb, aio-pika, expiringdict, pinecone, Postgres, pyarrow, Stripe, OpenAI, Sentry, Claude, Anthropic, Replicate, PostHog, Todoist, Google, ElevenLabs, Google Maps, AIOHTTP, React, Next.js, dexie, prompt-toolkit, prisma, SQLAlchemy, pyjwt, bcrypt, google-auth-oauthlib, en-core-web-sm, firecrawl-py, mem0ai, tavily-python, autogpt-libs, e2b, typesafe-sdk, exa-py, tiktoken, groq, e2b-code-interpreter, langfuse, rank-bm25, gtts, Ollama, spaCy, stagehand, fpdf2, moviepy, pillow, beautifulsoup4, agentmail, jinja2, postmarker, html2text, bleach, feedparser, gravitas-md2gdocs, openpyxl, pylatexenc, pypdf, pypdfium2, python-docx, youtube-transcript-api, yt-dlp, Pydantic, jsonschema, demjson3, prometheus-client, boto3, docker, prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator, psutil, class-variance-authority, geist, next-themes, Tailwind CSS, tailwind-merge, Framer, React Hook Form, Radix UI, sonner, recharts, use-stick-to-bottom, @tanstack/react-virtual, canvas-confetti, vaul, @rjsf/core, cmdk, @ferrucc-io/emoji-picker, boring-avatars, embla-carousel-react, motion, react-currency-input-field, react-day-picker, react-force-graph-2d, react-window, hugeicons, twemoji, Better Auth, bcryptjs, jose, ai, @ai-sdk/react, react-markdown, remark-gfm, streamdown, rehype-katex, shiki, highlight.js, katex, rehype-autolink-headings, rehype-highlight, rehype-slug, remark-math, rjsf, Zod, @hookform/resolvers
- Only in TradingAgents: LangChain, langchain-openai, LangGraph, langchain-anthropic, langchain-google-genai

## Side by side

| | AutoGPT | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 1,697,634 lines written, 4,331 code files | 25,828 lines written, 67 code files |
| Who writes it | 16.8% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, CodeRabbit, Mistral Vibe, Factory, Codex, Devin, and Gemini CLI | 2.1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Codex |
| Activity | Last push November 4, 2026, 9,582 commits, 187,891 stars | Last push November 4, 2026, 477 commits, 120,536 stars |
| Tests | 2,983 test files. 53.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | 90 test files. 85.1% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, AutoGPT or TradingAgents?

AutoGPT, with 1,697,634 lines written; TradingAgents has 25,828.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's code at commit 13ac38c](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/tree/13ac38c5b6583bd01b0a6142b0060fc03e102b6e)

### Which has more GitHub stars, AutoGPT or TradingAgents?

AutoGPT, with 187,891 stars; TradingAgents has 120,536.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT on GitHub](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)

### Which has more tests, AutoGPT or TradingAgents?

AutoGPT, with 2,983 test files; TradingAgents has 90.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's code at commit 13ac38c](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/tree/13ac38c5b6583bd01b0a6142b0060fc03e102b6e)

### Which was updated more recently, AutoGPT or TradingAgents?

Both got their last push on November 4, 2026.

The proof: [TauricResearch/TradingAgents's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/TauricResearch/TradingAgents/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, AutoGPT or TradingAgents?

AutoGPT: an AI signed 16.8% of its commits, with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, CodeRabbit, Mistral Vibe, Factory, Codex, Devin, and Gemini CLI; in TradingAgents, 2.1%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT](https://seerepo.com/r/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/ai)

## Sources

- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 13ac38c (https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/tree/13ac38c5b6583bd01b0a6142b0060fc03e102b6e)
- TauricResearch/TradingAgents: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 9fa1196 (https://github.com/TauricResearch/TradingAgents/tree/9fa1196fffbcfd9de5146d2dd2869df84ab99838)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.