Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/abi/screenshot-to-code/vs/unslothai/unsloth
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/abi/screenshot-to-code/vs/unslothai/unsloth.md
Description: screenshot-to-code and unsloth share 4 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, and OpenAI. Both are written in Python.

# screenshot-to-code vs unsloth

screenshot-to-code and unsloth share 4 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, and OpenAI. Both are written in Python.

- [abi/screenshot-to-code](https://seerepo.com/r/abi/screenshot-to-code): Drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue)
- [unslothai/unsloth](https://seerepo.com/r/unslothai/unsloth): Local UI to run and train LLMs and diffusion models. Supports GGUF, MLX, Qwen3.8, DeepSeek-V4.1, MiniMax-H3, Gemma 4, FLUX and more.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: React, Vite, FastAPI, OpenAI
- Only in screenshot-to-code: Anthropic
- Only in unsloth: None

## Side by side

| | screenshot-to-code | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 40,106 lines written, 174 code files | 3,781,227 lines written, 3,479 code files |
| Who writes it | 18.5% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Sweep, Cursor, and Codex | 1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Codex, and GitHub Copilot |
| Activity | Last push October 27, 2026, 1,289 commits, 80,882 stars | Last push October 30, 2026, 12,371 commits, 78,825 stars |
| Tests | 51 test files. 34.5% of its code files have a test that imports them | 5,478 test files. 59.8% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, screenshot-to-code or unsloth?

unsloth, with 3,781,227 lines written in 3,479 code files; screenshot-to-code has 40,106 in 174.

The proof: [unslothai/unsloth's code at commit 9dc1055](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth/tree/9dc1055a19a930b8cf171b912bb0645b8b1c6c45)

### Which has more GitHub stars, screenshot-to-code or unsloth?

screenshot-to-code, with 80,882 stars; unsloth has 78,825.

The proof: [abi/screenshot-to-code on GitHub](https://github.com/abi/screenshot-to-code)

### Which has more tests, screenshot-to-code or unsloth?

unsloth, with 5,478 test files; screenshot-to-code has 51.

The proof: [unslothai/unsloth's code at commit 9dc1055](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth/tree/9dc1055a19a930b8cf171b912bb0645b8b1c6c45)

### Which was updated more recently, screenshot-to-code or unsloth?

unsloth: its last push was on October 30, 2026, and screenshot-to-code's on October 27, 2026.

The proof: [unslothai/unsloth's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, screenshot-to-code or unsloth?

screenshot-to-code: an AI signed 18.5% of its commits, with Claude Code, Sweep, Cursor, and Codex; in unsloth, 1%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in abi/screenshot-to-code](https://seerepo.com/r/abi/screenshot-to-code/ai)

## Sources

- abi/screenshot-to-code: Read on October 29, 2026, at commit a813977 (https://github.com/abi/screenshot-to-code/tree/a8139779f7c5ae231b7f2a86fa7f83ddc5f7badc)
- unslothai/unsloth: Read on October 30, 2026, at commit 9dc1055 (https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth/tree/9dc1055a19a930b8cf171b912bb0645b8b1c6c45)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.