Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/alibaba/open-code-review/vs/charmbracelet/crush
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/alibaba/open-code-review/vs/charmbracelet/crush.md
Description: open-code-review and crush share 6 technologies: net/http, MCP, charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, and Model Context Protocol. Both are written in Go.

# open-code-review vs crush

open-code-review and crush share 6 technologies: net/http, MCP, charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, and Model Context Protocol. Both are written in Go.

- [alibaba/open-code-review](https://seerepo.com/r/alibaba/open-code-review): Secure, fast, efficient, battle-tested at Alibaba's scale. Hybrid architecture code review tool: deterministic pipelines + LLM Agent, precise line-level comments, built-in multi-language ruleset (NPE, thread-safety, XSS, SQL injection), OpenAI & Anthropic compatible.
- [charmbracelet/crush](https://seerepo.com/r/charmbracelet/crush): Glamourous agentic coding for all 💘

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: net/http, MCP, charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, Model Context Protocol
- Only in open-code-review: OpenAI, Anthropic, Preact, React, react-router-dom, openai-go, Coder, github.com/pkoukk/tiktoken-go, OpenTelemetry, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metric, github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetricgrpc, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttp, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric, Tailwind CSS, Mermaid, three, dompurify, marked, @opencode-ai/plugin
- Only in crush: SQLite, github.com/ncruces/go-sqlite3, github.com/pressly/goose/v3, PostHog, github.com/charmbracelet/ultraviolet, charm.land/glamour/v2, github.com/gen2brain/beeep, golang.org/x/oauth2, github.com/JohannesKaufmann/html-to-markdown, github.com/disintegration/imaging, github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery, github.com/invopop/jsonschema, gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2

## Side by side

| | open-code-review | crush |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 184,408 lines written, 317 code files | 200,570 lines written, 464 code files |
| Who writes it | 2.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Warp | 6.9% of its commits signed by AI. With Crush, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot |
| Activity | Last push November 5, 2026, 829 commits, 49,499 stars | Last push November 8, 2026, 4,177 commits, 28,993 stars |
| Tests | 381 test files. 69.4% of its code files have a test that imports them | 433 test files. 80.4% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, open-code-review or crush?

crush, with 200,570 lines written; open-code-review has 184,408.

The proof: [charmbracelet/crush's code at commit 8f1f029](https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/tree/8f1f02951cabc30b82e497fd916ca434bad1e6f4)

### Which has more GitHub stars, open-code-review or crush?

open-code-review, with 49,499 stars; crush has 28,993.

The proof: [alibaba/open-code-review on GitHub](https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review)

### Which has more tests, open-code-review or crush?

crush, with 433 test files; open-code-review has 381.

The proof: [charmbracelet/crush's code at commit 8f1f029](https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/tree/8f1f02951cabc30b82e497fd916ca434bad1e6f4)

### Which was updated more recently, open-code-review or crush?

crush: its last push was on November 8, 2026, and open-code-review's on November 5, 2026.

The proof: [charmbracelet/crush's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, open-code-review or crush?

crush: an AI signed 6.9% of its commits, with Crush, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot; in open-code-review, 2.3%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in charmbracelet/crush](https://seerepo.com/r/charmbracelet/crush/ai)

## Sources

- alibaba/open-code-review: Read on November 5, 2026, at commit 891df1b (https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review/tree/891df1b63f380845d882a289a67a6e36c331120c)
- charmbracelet/crush: Read on November 8, 2026, at commit 8f1f029 (https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/tree/8f1f02951cabc30b82e497fd916ca434bad1e6f4)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.