Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/alibaba/open-code-review/vs/dlvhdr/gh-dash
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/alibaba/open-code-review/vs/dlvhdr/gh-dash.md
Description: open-code-review and gh-dash share 4 technologies: charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, and Tailwind CSS. Both are written in Go.

# open-code-review vs gh-dash

open-code-review and gh-dash share 4 technologies: charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, and Tailwind CSS. Both are written in Go.

- [alibaba/open-code-review](https://seerepo.com/r/alibaba/open-code-review): Secure, fast, efficient, battle-tested at Alibaba's scale. Hybrid architecture code review tool: deterministic pipelines + LLM Agent, precise line-level comments, built-in multi-language ruleset (NPE, thread-safety, XSS, SQL injection), OpenAI & Anthropic compatible.
- [dlvhdr/gh-dash](https://seerepo.com/r/dlvhdr/gh-dash): A rich terminal UI for GitHub that doesn't break your flow.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, Tailwind CSS
- Only in open-code-review: net/http, OpenAI, Anthropic, MCP, Preact, React, react-router-dom, Model Context Protocol, openai-go, Coder, github.com/pkoukk/tiktoken-go, OpenTelemetry, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metric, github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetricgrpc, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttp, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdoutmetric, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric, Mermaid, three, dompurify, marked, @opencode-ai/plugin
- Only in gh-dash: charm.land/glamour/v2, github.com/gen2brain/beeep, github.com/yuin/goldmark-emoji, github.com/go-playground/validator/v10

## Side by side

| | open-code-review | gh-dash |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 187,193 lines written, 321 code files | 36,670 lines written, 100 code files |
| Who writes it | 2.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Warp | 0.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code |
| Activity | Last push November 10, 2026, 842 commits, 49,753 stars | Last push October 26, 2026, 649 commits, 12,740 stars |
| Tests | 397 test files. 69.8% of its code files have a test that imports them | 38 test files. 75% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, open-code-review or gh-dash?

open-code-review, with 187,193 lines written; gh-dash has 36,670.

The proof: [alibaba/open-code-review's code at commit f15c6db](https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review/tree/f15c6dbb575deed313d9945ced17e5de082c3ca7)

### Which has more GitHub stars, open-code-review or gh-dash?

open-code-review, with 49,753 stars; gh-dash has 12,740.

The proof: [alibaba/open-code-review on GitHub](https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review)

### Which has more tests, open-code-review or gh-dash?

open-code-review, with 397 test files; gh-dash has 38.

The proof: [alibaba/open-code-review's code at commit f15c6db](https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review/tree/f15c6dbb575deed313d9945ced17e5de082c3ca7)

### Which was updated more recently, open-code-review or gh-dash?

open-code-review: its last push was on November 10, 2026, and gh-dash's on October 26, 2026.

The proof: [alibaba/open-code-review's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, open-code-review or gh-dash?

open-code-review: an AI signed 2.3% of its commits, with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Warp; in gh-dash, 0.3%.

## Sources

- alibaba/open-code-review: Read on November 10, 2026, at commit f15c6db (https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review/tree/f15c6dbb575deed313d9945ced17e5de082c3ca7)
- dlvhdr/gh-dash: Read on November 10, 2026, at commit e6752f8 (https://github.com/dlvhdr/gh-dash/tree/e6752f8f2cf10f650d4f6e136385ba70f57d11f1)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.