Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/bee-san/Ciphey/vs/ultraworkers/claw-code
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/bee-san/Ciphey/vs/ultraworkers/claw-code.md
Description: Ciphey and claw-code share 4 technologies: rusqlite, SQLite, Tokio, and log. Both are written in Rust.

# Ciphey vs claw-code

Ciphey and claw-code share 4 technologies: rusqlite, SQLite, Tokio, and log. Both are written in Rust.

- [bee-san/Ciphey](https://seerepo.com/r/bee-san/Ciphey): ⚡ Automatically decrypt encryptions without knowing the key or cipher, decode encodings, and crack hashes ⚡
- [ultraworkers/claw-code](https://seerepo.com/r/ultraworkers/claw-code): An agent-managed museum exhibit, built in Rust with Gajae-Code / LazyCodex — developed and maintained with no human intervention.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: rusqlite, SQLite, Tokio, log
- Only in Ciphey: rmcp, env_logger
- Only in claw-code: axum, crossterm, tracing

## Side by side

| | Ciphey | claw-code |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 92,041 lines written, 130 code files | 136,696 lines written, 164 code files |
| Who writes it | 0.9% of its commits signed by AI. With Aider, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot | 2% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Warp, and Crush |
| Activity | Last push November 5, 2026, 2,230 commits, 21,744 stars | Last push November 2, 2026, 1,604 commits, 194,964 stars |
| Tests | 70 test files. 10.8% of its code files have a test that imports them | 25 test files. 9.1% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, Ciphey or claw-code?

claw-code, with 136,696 lines written; Ciphey has 92,041.

The proof: [ultraworkers/claw-code's code at commit 51cfca1](https://github.com/ultraworkers/claw-code/tree/51cfca114cf506a5d7a53ab1bffa8e1bbd3c780d)

### Which has more GitHub stars, Ciphey or claw-code?

claw-code, with 194,964 stars; Ciphey has 21,744.

The proof: [ultraworkers/claw-code on GitHub](https://github.com/ultraworkers/claw-code)

### Which has more tests, Ciphey or claw-code?

Ciphey, with 70 test files; claw-code has 25.

The proof: [bee-san/Ciphey's code at commit f7ad87d](https://github.com/bee-san/Ciphey/tree/f7ad87dd0d72f0543a70d235fcfcd61fe4009a67)

### Which was updated more recently, Ciphey or claw-code?

Ciphey: its last push was on November 5, 2026, and claw-code's on November 2, 2026.

The proof: [bee-san/Ciphey's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/bee-san/Ciphey/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, Ciphey or claw-code?

claw-code: an AI signed 2% of its commits, with Claude Code, Warp, and Crush; in Ciphey, 0.9%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in ultraworkers/claw-code](https://seerepo.com/r/ultraworkers/claw-code/ai)

## Sources

- bee-san/Ciphey: Read on November 5, 2026, at commit f7ad87d (https://github.com/bee-san/Ciphey/tree/f7ad87dd0d72f0543a70d235fcfcd61fe4009a67)
- ultraworkers/claw-code: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 51cfca1 (https://github.com/ultraworkers/claw-code/tree/51cfca114cf506a5d7a53ab1bffa8e1bbd3c780d)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.