Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/bitwarden/android/vs/topjohnwu/Magisk
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/bitwarden/android/vs/topjohnwu/Magisk.md
Description: android and Magisk share 9 technologies: Jetpack Compose, androidx.navigation3:navigation3-ui, androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-viewmodel-navigation3, core-ktx, lifecycle-runtime-compose, androidx.navigation3:navigation3-runtime, androidx.compose.animation:animation, androidx.core:core-splashscreen, and com.jakewharton.timber:timber. Both are written in Kotlin.

# android vs Magisk

android and Magisk share 9 technologies: Jetpack Compose, androidx.navigation3:navigation3-ui, androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-viewmodel-navigation3, core-ktx, lifecycle-runtime-compose, androidx.navigation3:navigation3-runtime, androidx.compose.animation:animation, androidx.core:core-splashscreen, and com.jakewharton.timber:timber. Both are written in Kotlin.

- [bitwarden/android](https://seerepo.com/r/bitwarden/android): Bitwarden mobile apps (Password Manager and Authenticator) for Android.
- [topjohnwu/Magisk](https://seerepo.com/r/topjohnwu/Magisk): The Magic Mask for Android

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Jetpack Compose, androidx.navigation3:navigation3-ui, androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-viewmodel-navigation3, core-ktx, lifecycle-runtime-compose, androidx.navigation3:navigation3-runtime, androidx.compose.animation:animation, androidx.core:core-splashscreen, com.jakewharton.timber:timber
- Only in android: androidx.hilt:hilt-lifecycle-viewmodel-compose, Firebase, com.google.dagger:hilt-android, lifecycle-process, lifecycle-runtime-ktx, camera-view, ui-graphics, androidx.appcompat:appcompat, androidx.compose.material3.adaptive:adaptive, androidx.camera:camera-compose, room3-runtime, androidx.credentials:credentials, androidx.biometric:biometric, coil, coil-compose, coil-gif, csv, com.google.zxing:core, Fastlane, logger
- Only in Magisk: androidx.activity:activity, androidx.navigationevent:navigationevent-compose, androidx.window:window-core, activity-compose, material3-adaptive-navigation-suite, com.google.accompanist:accompanist-drawablepainter, Google, androidx.compose.material:material-icons-extended, room-ktx, room-runtime, io.noties.markwon:core

## Side by side

| | android | Magisk |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 468,847 lines written, 1,922 code files | 43,581 lines written, 189 code files |
| Who writes it | 1.1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code | 0.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Cursor and Claude Code |
| Activity | Last push November 14, 2026, 4,761 commits, 9,632 stars | Last push November 10, 2026, 7,868 commits, 63,966 stars |
| Tests | 698 test files. 67.2% of its code files have a test that imports them | 6 test files. 9.5% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, android or Magisk?

android, with 468,847 lines written; Magisk has 43,581.

The proof: [bitwarden/android's code at commit 6366dd5](https://github.com/bitwarden/android/tree/6366dd5b848eeef3206501d42040302ad0be1042)

### Which has more GitHub stars, android or Magisk?

Magisk, with 63,966 stars; android has 9,632.

The proof: [topjohnwu/Magisk on GitHub](https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk)

### Which has more tests, android or Magisk?

android, with 698 test files; Magisk has 6.

The proof: [bitwarden/android's code at commit 6366dd5](https://github.com/bitwarden/android/tree/6366dd5b848eeef3206501d42040302ad0be1042)

### Which was updated more recently, android or Magisk?

android: its last push was on November 14, 2026, and Magisk's on November 10, 2026.

The proof: [bitwarden/android's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/bitwarden/android/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, android or Magisk?

android: an AI signed 1.1% of its commits, with Claude Code; in Magisk, 0.7%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in bitwarden/android](https://seerepo.com/r/bitwarden/android/ai)

## Sources

- bitwarden/android: Read on November 14, 2026, at commit 6366dd5 (https://github.com/bitwarden/android/tree/6366dd5b848eeef3206501d42040302ad0be1042)
- topjohnwu/Magisk: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit 70d233c (https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/tree/70d233cae2f0aeef75275f4d30bccb1b368d1ae3)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.