Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/charmbracelet/crush/vs/google/osv-scanner
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/charmbracelet/crush/vs/google/osv-scanner.md
Description: crush and osv-scanner share 4 technologies: MCP, charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/glamour/v2, and Model Context Protocol. Both are written in Go.

# crush vs osv-scanner

crush and osv-scanner share 4 technologies: MCP, charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/glamour/v2, and Model Context Protocol. Both are written in Go.

- [charmbracelet/crush](https://seerepo.com/r/charmbracelet/crush): Glamourous agentic coding for all 💘
- [google/osv-scanner](https://seerepo.com/r/google/osv-scanner): Vulnerability scanner written in Go which uses the data provided by https://osv.dev

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: MCP, charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/glamour/v2, Model Context Protocol
- Only in crush: net/http, SQLite, github.com/ncruces/go-sqlite3, github.com/pressly/goose/v3, PostHog, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, charm.land/bubbles/v2, github.com/charmbracelet/ultraviolet, github.com/gen2brain/beeep, golang.org/x/oauth2, github.com/JohannesKaufmann/html-to-markdown, github.com/disintegration/imaging, github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery, github.com/invopop/jsonschema, gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2
- Only in osv-scanner: github.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6

## Side by side

| | crush | osv-scanner |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 200,570 lines written, 464 code files | 45,296 lines written, 123 code files |
| Who writes it | 6.9% of its commits signed by AI. With Crush, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot | 0.6% of its commits signed by AI. With Jules and Gemini CLI |
| Activity | Last push November 8, 2026, 4,177 commits, 28,993 stars | Last push November 12, 2026, 2,132 commits, 11,500 stars |
| Tests | 433 test files. 80.4% of its code files have a test that imports them | 112 test files. 65.9% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, crush or osv-scanner?

crush, with 200,570 lines written; osv-scanner has 45,296.

The proof: [charmbracelet/crush's code at commit 8f1f029](https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/tree/8f1f02951cabc30b82e497fd916ca434bad1e6f4)

### Which has more GitHub stars, crush or osv-scanner?

crush, with 28,993 stars; osv-scanner has 11,500.

The proof: [charmbracelet/crush on GitHub](https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush)

### Which has more tests, crush or osv-scanner?

crush, with 433 test files; osv-scanner has 112.

The proof: [charmbracelet/crush's code at commit 8f1f029](https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/tree/8f1f02951cabc30b82e497fd916ca434bad1e6f4)

### Which was updated more recently, crush or osv-scanner?

osv-scanner: its last push was on November 12, 2026, and crush's on November 8, 2026.

The proof: [google/osv-scanner's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, crush or osv-scanner?

crush: an AI signed 6.9% of its commits, with Crush, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot; in osv-scanner, 0.6%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in charmbracelet/crush](https://seerepo.com/r/charmbracelet/crush/ai)

## Sources

- charmbracelet/crush: Read on November 8, 2026, at commit 8f1f029 (https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/tree/8f1f02951cabc30b82e497fd916ca434bad1e6f4)
- google/osv-scanner: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit 80fe505 (https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/tree/80fe50567a5d6e0ec408353e2ceacca1561b91be)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.