Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/chenhg5/cc-connect/vs/langflow-ai/langflow
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/chenhg5/cc-connect/vs/langflow-ai/langflow.md
Description: cc-connect and langflow share 7 technologies: Vite, React, react-router-dom, Tailwind CSS, Lucide, react-markdown, and remark-gfm. cc-connect is written in Go and langflow in Python.

# cc-connect vs langflow

cc-connect and langflow share 7 technologies: Vite, React, react-router-dom, Tailwind CSS, Lucide, react-markdown, and remark-gfm. cc-connect is written in Go and langflow in Python.

- [chenhg5/cc-connect](https://seerepo.com/r/chenhg5/cc-connect): Bridge local AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex) to messaging platforms (Feishu/Lark, DingTalk, Slack, Telegram, Discord, LINE, WeChat Work). Chat with your AI dev assistant from anywhere — no public IP required for most platforms.
- [langflow-ai/langflow](https://seerepo.com/r/langflow-ai/langflow): Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Vite, React, react-router-dom, Tailwind CSS, Lucide, react-markdown, remark-gfm
- Only in cc-connect: net/http, SQLite, github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea, github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss, github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles, golang.org/x/oauth2, github.com/mdp/qrterminal/v3, rsc.io/qr, rehype-highlight, qrcode.react
- Only in langflow: FastAPI, pyarrow, oracledb, Redis, Google, OpenAI, uvicorn, AIOHTTP, Rich, SQLAlchemy, cryptography, pyjwt, bcrypt, google-auth-oauthlib, firecrawl-py, LangChain, langchain-classic, MCP, exa-py, pillow, defusedxml, pypdf, markitdown, Pydantic, jsonschema, msgspec, validators, psutil, loguru, boto3, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, xyflow, Radix UI, ag-grid-community, Framer, react-hotkeys-hook, use-stick-to-bottom, react-syntax-highlighter, ace-builds, Headless UI, cmdk, elkjs, react-day-picker, react-error-boundary, react-sortablejs, reactflow, react-icons, @radix-ui/react-icons, dompurify, rehype-sanitize, rehype-raw

## Side by side

| | cc-connect | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 257,116 lines written, 309 code files | 1,446,517 lines written, 3,937 code files |
| Who writes it | 60.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, and GitHub Copilot | 1.5% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex, and Warp |
| Activity | Last push November 7, 2026, 1,308 commits, 16,271 stars | Last push November 4, 2026, 17,600 commits, 156,316 stars |
| Tests | 307 test files. 59.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | 3,083 test files. 35.1% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, cc-connect or langflow?

langflow, with 1,446,517 lines written; cc-connect has 257,116.

The proof: [langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc](https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/tree/60999cc9a7350e44dde3ef641baae864e10861f0)

### Which has more GitHub stars, cc-connect or langflow?

langflow, with 156,316 stars; cc-connect has 16,271.

The proof: [langflow-ai/langflow on GitHub](https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow)

### Which has more tests, cc-connect or langflow?

langflow, with 3,083 test files; cc-connect has 307.

The proof: [langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc](https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/tree/60999cc9a7350e44dde3ef641baae864e10861f0)

### Which was updated more recently, cc-connect or langflow?

cc-connect: its last push was on November 7, 2026, and langflow's on November 4, 2026.

The proof: [chenhg5/cc-connect's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/chenhg5/cc-connect/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, cc-connect or langflow?

cc-connect: an AI signed 60.3% of its commits, with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, and GitHub Copilot; in langflow, 1.5%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in chenhg5/cc-connect](https://seerepo.com/r/chenhg5/cc-connect/ai)

## Sources

- chenhg5/cc-connect: Read on November 7, 2026, at commit 0df6cba (https://github.com/chenhg5/cc-connect/tree/0df6cba1c30682646ef51e0d6f91825045891f72)
- langflow-ai/langflow: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 60999cc (https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/tree/60999cc9a7350e44dde3ef641baae864e10861f0)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.