Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/chinabugotech/hutool/vs/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/chinabugotech/hutool/vs/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler.md
Description: hutool and MediaCrawler share 3 technologies: Redis, Postgres, and MongoDB. hutool is written in Java and MediaCrawler in Python.

# hutool vs MediaCrawler

hutool and MediaCrawler share 3 technologies: Redis, Postgres, and MongoDB. hutool is written in Java and MediaCrawler in Python.

- [chinabugotech/hutool](https://seerepo.com/r/chinabugotech/hutool): 🍬A set of tools that keep Java sweet.
- [NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler](https://seerepo.com/r/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler): 小红书笔记 | 评论爬虫、抖音视频 | 评论爬虫、快手视频 | 评论爬虫、B 站视频 ｜ 评论爬虫、微博帖子 ｜ 评论爬虫、百度贴吧帖子 ｜ 百度贴吧评论回复爬虫  | 知乎问答文章｜评论爬虫

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Redis, Postgres, MongoDB
- Only in hutool: None
- Only in MediaCrawler: React, Vite, FastAPI

## Side by side

| | hutool | MediaCrawler |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 305,773 lines written, 1,557 code files | 40,863 lines written, 176 code files |
| Who writes it | 0% of its commits signed by AI | 2.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Codex |
| Activity | Last push October 30, 2026, 5,118 commits, 30,235 stars | Last push October 27, 2026, 661 commits, 68,918 stars |
| Tests | 717 test files. 41.6% of its code files have a test that imports them | 39 test files. 27.8% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, hutool or MediaCrawler?

hutool, with 305,773 lines written in 1,557 code files; MediaCrawler has 40,863 in 176.

The proof: [chinabugotech/hutool's code at commit 87ec118](https://github.com/chinabugotech/hutool/tree/87ec11862baae72914df703e25939eb44a8a843c)

### Which has more GitHub stars, hutool or MediaCrawler?

MediaCrawler, with 68,918 stars; hutool has 30,235.

The proof: [NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler on GitHub](https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler)

### Which has more tests, hutool or MediaCrawler?

hutool, with 717 test files; MediaCrawler has 39.

The proof: [chinabugotech/hutool's code at commit 87ec118](https://github.com/chinabugotech/hutool/tree/87ec11862baae72914df703e25939eb44a8a843c)

### Which was updated more recently, hutool or MediaCrawler?

hutool: its last push was on October 30, 2026, and MediaCrawler's on October 27, 2026.

The proof: [chinabugotech/hutool's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/chinabugotech/hutool/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, hutool or MediaCrawler?

MediaCrawler: an AI signed 2.7% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex.

## Sources

- chinabugotech/hutool: Read on November 2, 2026, at commit 87ec118 (https://github.com/chinabugotech/hutool/tree/87ec11862baae72914df703e25939eb44a8a843c)
- NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler: Read on October 30, 2026, at commit 68d9ef1 (https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler/tree/68d9ef1c1da22eab75940dfd7cec259907006538)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.