Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/datawhalechina/hello-agents/vs/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/datawhalechina/hello-agents/vs/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler.md
Description: hello-agents and MediaCrawler share 5 technologies: Vite, React, FastAPI, Postgres, and Redis. Both are written in Python.

# hello-agents vs MediaCrawler

hello-agents and MediaCrawler share 5 technologies: Vite, React, FastAPI, Postgres, and Redis. Both are written in Python.

- [datawhalechina/hello-agents](https://seerepo.com/r/datawhalechina/hello-agents): 📚 《从零开始构建智能体》——从零开始的智能体原理与实践教程
- [NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler](https://seerepo.com/r/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler): 小红书笔记 | 评论爬虫、抖音视频 | 评论爬虫、快手视频 | 评论爬虫、B 站视频 ｜ 评论爬虫、微博帖子 ｜ 评论爬虫、百度贴吧帖子 ｜ 百度贴吧评论回复爬虫  | 知乎问答文章｜评论爬虫

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Vite, React, FastAPI, Postgres, Redis
- Only in hello-agents: Vue, OpenAI
- Only in MediaCrawler: MongoDB

## Side by side

| | hello-agents | MediaCrawler |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 226,666 lines written, 1,268 code files | 40,863 lines written, 176 code files |
| Who writes it | 2.4% of its commits signed by AI. With Codex, Cursor, and Claude Code | 2.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Codex |
| Activity | Last push October 13, 2026, 660 commits, 84,924 stars | Last push October 27, 2026, 661 commits, 68,755 stars |
| Tests | 97 test files. 6.6% of its code files have a test that imports them | 39 test files. 27.8% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, hello-agents or MediaCrawler?

hello-agents, with 226,666 lines written in 1,268 code files; MediaCrawler has 40,863 in 176.

The proof: [datawhalechina/hello-agents's code at commit 36f583c](https://github.com/datawhalechina/hello-agents/tree/36f583c233ea5cee4537ef93455702b55053af18)

### Which has more GitHub stars, hello-agents or MediaCrawler?

hello-agents, with 84,924 stars; MediaCrawler has 68,755.

The proof: [datawhalechina/hello-agents on GitHub](https://github.com/datawhalechina/hello-agents)

### Which has more tests, hello-agents or MediaCrawler?

hello-agents, with 97 test files; MediaCrawler has 39.

The proof: [datawhalechina/hello-agents's code at commit 36f583c](https://github.com/datawhalechina/hello-agents/tree/36f583c233ea5cee4537ef93455702b55053af18)

### Which was updated more recently, hello-agents or MediaCrawler?

MediaCrawler: its last push was on October 27, 2026, and hello-agents's on October 13, 2026.

The proof: [NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, hello-agents or MediaCrawler?

MediaCrawler: an AI signed 2.7% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in hello-agents, 2.4%.

## Sources

- datawhalechina/hello-agents: Read on October 27, 2026, at commit 36f583c (https://github.com/datawhalechina/hello-agents/tree/36f583c233ea5cee4537ef93455702b55053af18)
- NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler: Read on October 27, 2026, at commit 68d9ef1 (https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler/tree/68d9ef1c1da22eab75940dfd7cec259907006538)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.