Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT/vs/langflow-ai/langflow
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT/vs/langflow-ai/langflow.md
Description: DB-GPT and langflow share 13 technologies: FastAPI, uvicorn, AIOHTTP, React, SQLAlchemy, Pydantic, psutil, Tailwind CSS, reactflow, react-syntax-highlighter, remark-gfm, react-markdown, and rehype-raw. Both are written in Python.

# DB-GPT vs langflow

DB-GPT and langflow share 13 technologies: FastAPI, uvicorn, AIOHTTP, React, SQLAlchemy, Pydantic, psutil, Tailwind CSS, reactflow, react-syntax-highlighter, remark-gfm, react-markdown, and rehype-raw. Both are written in Python.

- [eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT](https://seerepo.com/r/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT): open-source agentic AI data assistant for the next generation of AI + Data products.
- [langflow-ai/langflow](https://seerepo.com/r/langflow-ai/langflow): Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: FastAPI, uvicorn, AIOHTTP, React, SQLAlchemy, Pydantic, psutil, Tailwind CSS, reactflow, react-syntax-highlighter, remark-gfm, react-markdown, rehype-raw
- Only in DB-GPT: pymysql, Next.js, MySQL, sqlglot, pytesseract, docker, classnames, @ant-design/cssinjs, antd, AntV, monaco-editor, react-grid-layout, @uiw/react-json-view, nprogress, react-resizable, react-virtualized, Ant Design, MUI, Sequelize, iron-session, html2canvas, markdown-it, jspdf, katex, rehype-katex, remark-math, Ajv
- Only in langflow: pyarrow, oracledb, Redis, Google, OpenAI, Vite, react-router-dom, Rich, cryptography, pyjwt, bcrypt, google-auth-oauthlib, firecrawl-py, LangChain, langchain-classic, MCP, exa-py, pillow, defusedxml, pypdf, markitdown, jsonschema, msgspec, validators, loguru, boto3, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, xyflow, Radix UI, ag-grid-community, Framer, react-hotkeys-hook, use-stick-to-bottom, ace-builds, Headless UI, cmdk, elkjs, react-day-picker, react-error-boundary, react-sortablejs, Lucide, react-icons, @radix-ui/react-icons, dompurify, rehype-sanitize

## Side by side

| | DB-GPT | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 463,020 lines written, 2,162 code files | 1,446,517 lines written, 3,937 code files |
| Who writes it | 1.6% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor | 1.5% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex, and Warp |
| Activity | Last push November 4, 2026, 2,574 commits, 20,262 stars | Last push November 4, 2026, 17,600 commits, 156,316 stars |
| Tests | 488 test files. 13.4% of its code files have a test that imports them | 3,083 test files. 35.1% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, DB-GPT or langflow?

langflow, with 1,446,517 lines written; DB-GPT has 463,020.

The proof: [langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc](https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/tree/60999cc9a7350e44dde3ef641baae864e10861f0)

### Which has more GitHub stars, DB-GPT or langflow?

langflow, with 156,316 stars; DB-GPT has 20,262.

The proof: [langflow-ai/langflow on GitHub](https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow)

### Which has more tests, DB-GPT or langflow?

langflow, with 3,083 test files; DB-GPT has 488.

The proof: [langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc](https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/tree/60999cc9a7350e44dde3ef641baae864e10861f0)

### Which was updated more recently, DB-GPT or langflow?

Both got their last push on November 4, 2026.

The proof: [eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, DB-GPT or langflow?

DB-GPT: an AI signed 1.6% of its commits, with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor; in langflow, 1.5%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT](https://seerepo.com/r/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT/ai)

## Sources

- eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT: Read on November 5, 2026, at commit 9d50d0a (https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT/tree/9d50d0a55071a040a8cb7684b3b6acfa13cc7c47)
- langflow-ai/langflow: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 60999cc (https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/tree/60999cc9a7350e44dde3ef641baae864e10861f0)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.