Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/farion1231/cc-switch/vs/tonhowtf/omniget
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/farion1231/cc-switch/vs/tonhowtf/omniget.md
Description: cc-switch and omniget share 16 technologies: Vite, React, Tauri, axum, objc2-foundation, rusqlite, SQLite, tauri-plugin-store, Tokio, @tauri-apps/api, tauri-plugin-dialog, webkit2gtk, webview2-com, hmac, zip, and tauri-apps. Both are written in Rust.

# cc-switch vs omniget

cc-switch and omniget share 16 technologies: Vite, React, Tauri, axum, objc2-foundation, rusqlite, SQLite, tauri-plugin-store, Tokio, @tauri-apps/api, tauri-plugin-dialog, webkit2gtk, webview2-com, hmac, zip, and tauri-apps. Both are written in Rust.

- [farion1231/cc-switch](https://seerepo.com/r/farion1231/cc-switch): A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode,DeepSeek Harness and more. Only official website: ccswitch.io
- [tonhowtf/omniget](https://seerepo.com/r/tonhowtf/omniget): Free, open source video downloader for Windows, macOS and Linux that AI agents can drive. Downloads from YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, X, Reddit, torrents and the sites yt-dlp supports. Its MCP server lets Claude Code, Cursor and Codex queue downloads, and it runs Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI and Ollama as agents.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Vite, React, Tauri, axum, objc2-foundation, rusqlite, SQLite, tauri-plugin-store, Tokio, @tauri-apps/api, tauri-plugin-dialog, webkit2gtk, webview2-com, hmac, zip, tauri-apps
- Only in cc-switch: objc2-app-kit, tower, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, @codemirror/theme-one-dark, tailwind-merge, Radix UI, React Hook Form, dnd-kit, Framer, @tanstack/react-virtual, CodeMirror, sonner, recharts, cmdk, gtk, tauri-plugin-window-state, Lucide, rmcp, png, yaml, @hookform/resolvers, Zod, log, tauri-plugin-log
- Only in omniget: SvelteKit, Svelte, tauri-plugin-notification, thinking-orbs, @tauri-apps/plugin-notification, indicatif, objc2-web-kit, ed25519-dalek, keyring, oauth2, ort, image, marked, qrcode, tracing, tracing-subscriber

## Side by side

| | cc-switch | omniget |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 594,551 lines written, 853 code files | 339,694 lines written, 847 code files |
| Who writes it | 1.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor | 1.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Cursor, and Warp |
| Activity | Last push November 12, 2026, 3,582 commits, 153,702 stars | Last push September 27, 2026, 2,816 commits, 14,368 stars |
| Tests | 350 test files. 38.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | 113 test files. 17.6% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, cc-switch or omniget?

cc-switch, with 594,551 lines written; omniget has 339,694.

The proof: [farion1231/cc-switch's code at commit 3a0b86a](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/tree/3a0b86a26649f61d86dfbc3878d73220199f70b2)

### Which has more GitHub stars, cc-switch or omniget?

cc-switch, with 153,702 stars; omniget has 14,368.

The proof: [farion1231/cc-switch on GitHub](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch)

### Which has more tests, cc-switch or omniget?

cc-switch, with 350 test files; omniget has 113.

The proof: [farion1231/cc-switch's code at commit 3a0b86a](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/tree/3a0b86a26649f61d86dfbc3878d73220199f70b2)

### Which was updated more recently, cc-switch or omniget?

cc-switch: its last push was on November 12, 2026, and omniget's on September 27, 2026.

The proof: [farion1231/cc-switch's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, cc-switch or omniget?

In both, an AI signed 1.7% of their commits.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in farion1231/cc-switch](https://seerepo.com/r/farion1231/cc-switch/ai)

## Sources

- farion1231/cc-switch: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit 3a0b86a (https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/tree/3a0b86a26649f61d86dfbc3878d73220199f70b2)
- tonhowtf/omniget: Read on November 13, 2026, at commit 5d91e41 (https://github.com/tonhowtf/omniget/tree/5d91e41a9c527cadabfa08b85971e5a069fb8835)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.