Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/fishjar/kiss-translator/vs/HKUDS/LightRAG
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/fishjar/kiss-translator/vs/HKUDS/LightRAG.md
Description: kiss-translator and LightRAG share 9 technologies: React, Vite, react-router-dom, katex, react-markdown, rehype-katex, rehype-raw, remark-gfm, and remark-math. kiss-translator is written in JavaScript and LightRAG in Python.

# kiss-translator vs LightRAG

kiss-translator and LightRAG share 9 technologies: React, Vite, react-router-dom, katex, react-markdown, rehype-katex, rehype-raw, remark-gfm, and remark-math. kiss-translator is written in JavaScript and LightRAG in Python.

- [fishjar/kiss-translator](https://seerepo.com/r/fishjar/kiss-translator): A simple, open source bilingual translation extension & Greasemonkey script (一个简约、开源的 双语对照翻译扩展 & 油猴脚本)
- [HKUDS/LightRAG](https://seerepo.com/r/HKUDS/LightRAG): [EMNLP2025] LightRAG: Simple and Fast Retrieval-Augmented Generation

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: React, Vite, react-router-dom, katex, react-markdown, rehype-katex, rehype-raw, remark-gfm, remark-math
- Only in kiss-translator: emotion, postcss-selector-parser, MUI, @mui/icons-material, Hugging Face, onnxruntime-web, @paddleocr/paddleocr-js, @wllama/wllama, dompurify, mp4box, pdfjs-dist, parse5, rehype-stringify, remark, remark-parse, remark-stringify, unified
- Only in LightRAG: FastAPI, asyncpg, pgvector, pymongo, Postgres, MongoDB, Redis, Neo4j, aioboto3, pymilvus, OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Qdrant, AIOHTTP, bcrypt, en-core-web-sm, llama-index-llms-openai, spacy-pkuseg, tiktoken, faiss-cpu, llama-index, Ollama, spaCy, voyageai, zhipuai, python-docx, xlsxwriter, openpyxl, pypdf, python-pptx, Pydantic, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, sonner, Radix UI, @react-sigma/core, react-dropzone, graphology-layout-forceatlas2, sigma, cmdk, graphology-layout-force, graphology-layout-noverlap, Mermaid, react-error-boundary, react-number-format, react-syntax-highlighter, Lucide, rehype-sanitize, unist-util-visit

## Side by side

| | kiss-translator | LightRAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 345,090 lines written, 630 code files | 442,998 lines written, 336 code files |
| Who writes it | 1.1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Amp, and Cursor | 19.8% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Jules |
| Activity | Last push November 10, 2026, 1,596 commits, 13,261 stars | Last push November 5, 2026, 8,260 commits, 40,574 stars |
| Tests | 452 test files. 75.2% of its code files have a test that imports them | 676 test files. 66.1% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, kiss-translator or LightRAG?

LightRAG, with 442,998 lines written; kiss-translator has 345,090.

The proof: [HKUDS/LightRAG's code at commit aaebfe1](https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/tree/aaebfe1bb8d55deb6a4304d357a3bf4c92fcd40a)

### Which has more GitHub stars, kiss-translator or LightRAG?

LightRAG, with 40,574 stars; kiss-translator has 13,261.

The proof: [HKUDS/LightRAG on GitHub](https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG)

### Which has more tests, kiss-translator or LightRAG?

LightRAG, with 676 test files; kiss-translator has 452.

The proof: [HKUDS/LightRAG's code at commit aaebfe1](https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/tree/aaebfe1bb8d55deb6a4304d357a3bf4c92fcd40a)

### Which was updated more recently, kiss-translator or LightRAG?

kiss-translator: its last push was on November 10, 2026, and LightRAG's on November 5, 2026.

The proof: [fishjar/kiss-translator's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/fishjar/kiss-translator/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, kiss-translator or LightRAG?

LightRAG: an AI signed 19.8% of its commits, with Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Jules; in kiss-translator, 1.1%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in HKUDS/LightRAG](https://seerepo.com/r/HKUDS/LightRAG/ai)

## Sources

- fishjar/kiss-translator: Read on November 10, 2026, at commit 1c46c6e (https://github.com/fishjar/kiss-translator/tree/1c46c6e2f88e96a332b8740543ae3ee527ad089a)
- HKUDS/LightRAG: Read on November 6, 2026, at commit aaebfe1 (https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/tree/aaebfe1bb8d55deb6a4304d357a3bf4c92fcd40a)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.
