Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/fosrl/pangolin/vs/ruvnet/ruflo
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/fosrl/pangolin/vs/ruvnet/ruflo.md
Description: pangolin and ruflo share 20 technologies: React, Express, SQLite, Postgres, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, next-themes, tailwind-merge, React Hook Form, Radix UI, input-otp, recharts, cmdk, react-day-picker, vaul, Lucide, helmet, js-yaml, yaml, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript.

# pangolin vs ruflo

pangolin and ruflo share 20 technologies: React, Express, SQLite, Postgres, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, next-themes, tailwind-merge, React Hook Form, Radix UI, input-otp, recharts, cmdk, react-day-picker, vaul, Lucide, helmet, js-yaml, yaml, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript.

- [fosrl/pangolin](https://seerepo.com/r/fosrl/pangolin): Modern networking and security platform providing secure access and connectivity to apps, infrastructure, and AI workloads. Connect and protect your users.
- [ruvnet/ruflo](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/ruflo): 🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: React, Express, SQLite, Postgres, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, next-themes, tailwind-merge, React Hook Form, Radix UI, input-otp, recharts, cmdk, react-day-picker, vaul, Lucide, helmet, js-yaml, yaml, Zod
- Only in pangolin: Next.js, lru-cache, Redis, Stripe, AWS S3, PostHog, github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss, @tanstack/react-table, @monaco-editor/react, canvas-confetti, D3, Headless UI, nextjs-toploader, xterm, @radix-ui/react-icons, react-icons, Drizzle, simplewebauthn, jsonwebtoken, react-email, qrcode.react, nodemailer, zod-validation-error, @hookform/resolvers, winston, winston-daily-rotate-file
- Only in ruflo: sql.js, Google Cloud, MCP, Svelte, SvelteKit, MongoDB, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Tokio, Vite, react-router-dom, Supabase, jose, bits-ui, web-haptics, marked, katex, file-type, handlebars, highlight.js, htmlparser2, isomorphic-dompurify, satori, sharp, pino, prom-client, Ajv, tracing, @xenova/transformers, hmac, bcryptjs, embla-carousel-react, react-resizable-panels, reactflow, sonner

## Side by side

| | pangolin | ruflo |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 349,039 lines written, 1,855 code files | 1,153,806 lines written, 2,525 code files |
| Who writes it | 0.7% of its commits signed by AI. With GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex | 35.9% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Codex |
| Activity | Last push November 4, 2026, 7,511 commits, 23,313 stars | Last push November 4, 2026, 9,037 commits, 80,870 stars |
| Tests | 24 test files. 1.1% of its code files have a test that imports them | 1,805 test files. 49.3% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, pangolin or ruflo?

ruflo, with 1,153,806 lines written; pangolin has 349,039.

The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit 1c0d63c](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/tree/1c0d63c79aa2879d7029cc793501d7086d06f124)

### Which has more GitHub stars, pangolin or ruflo?

ruflo, with 80,870 stars; pangolin has 23,313.

The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo)

### Which has more tests, pangolin or ruflo?

ruflo, with 1,805 test files; pangolin has 24.

The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit 1c0d63c](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/tree/1c0d63c79aa2879d7029cc793501d7086d06f124)

### Which was updated more recently, pangolin or ruflo?

Both got their last push on November 4, 2026.

The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, pangolin or ruflo?

ruflo: an AI signed 35.9% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in pangolin, 0.7%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in ruvnet/ruflo](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/ruflo/ai)

## Sources

- fosrl/pangolin: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit aaec7f4 (https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/tree/aaec7f44c47eee61649e581405154419b8ad6982)
- ruvnet/ruflo: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 1c0d63c (https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/tree/1c0d63c79aa2879d7029cc793501d7086d06f124)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.