Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/glzr-io/glazewm/vs/spacedriveapp/spacedrive
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/glzr-io/glazewm/vs/spacedriveapp/spacedrive.md
Description: glazewm and spacedrive share 7 technologies: Tokio, objc2-app-kit, objc2-foundation, image, tracing, tracing-subscriber, and tracing-appender. Both are written in Rust.

# glazewm vs spacedrive

glazewm and spacedrive share 7 technologies: Tokio, objc2-app-kit, objc2-foundation, image, tracing, tracing-subscriber, and tracing-appender. Both are written in Rust.

- [glzr-io/glazewm](https://seerepo.com/r/glzr-io/glazewm): GlazeWM is a tiling window manager for macOS and Windows inspired by i3wm.
- [spacedriveapp/spacedrive](https://seerepo.com/r/spacedriveapp/spacedrive): Spacedrive is an open source cross-platform file explorer, powered by a virtual distributed filesystem written in Rust.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Tokio, objc2-app-kit, objc2-foundation, image, tracing, tracing-subscriber, tracing-appender
- Only in glazewm: tray-icon
- Only in spacedrive: axum, axum-extra, rusqlite, sqlx-sqlite, sqlx, SQLite, opendal, tower, gpui, hermes-android, react-android, React, react-native, Expo, react-navigation, @react-native-async-storage/async-storage, JetBrains, Vite, Tauri, @tauri-apps/api, react-router-dom, console, dialoguer, objc2-ui-kit, Ratatui, comfy-table, crossterm, gpui_platform, gpui-component, indicatif, inquire, sea-orm, sea-orm-migration, argon2, hmac, hkdf, ed25519-dalek, keyring, whisper-rs, rmcp, hound, kamadak-exif, pdfium-render, resvg, webp, zip, jsonschema, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Facebook, react-native-safe-area-context, expo-blur, @callstack/liquid-glass, react-native-reanimated, @react-native-community/slider, expo-camera, react-native-gesture-handler, phosphor-react-native, com.facebook.fresco:animated-webp, react-native-qrcode-svg, tauri-plugin-dialog, @phosphor-icons/react, Framer, React Hook Form, TanStack, react-selecto, dnd-kit, Radix UI, three, D3, MapLibre, ogl, react-masonry-css, react-three, prismjs, qrcode, valibot

## Side by side

| | glazewm | spacedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 25,891 lines written, 173 code files | 359,902 lines written, 1,504 code files |
| Who writes it | 0.2% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and GitHub Copilot | 6.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Cursor and Claude Code |
| Activity | Last push June 20, 2026, 1,789 commits, 12,988 stars | Last push November 6, 2026, 4,778 commits, 39,443 stars |
| Tests | 2 test files. 12.7% of its code files have a test that imports them | 128 test files. 5.3% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, glazewm or spacedrive?

spacedrive, with 359,902 lines written; glazewm has 25,891.

The proof: [spacedriveapp/spacedrive's code at commit 11523b2](https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive/tree/11523b224d1422d98def9a1c0f99e89fafada00d)

### Which has more GitHub stars, glazewm or spacedrive?

spacedrive, with 39,443 stars; glazewm has 12,988.

The proof: [spacedriveapp/spacedrive on GitHub](https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive)

### Which has more tests, glazewm or spacedrive?

spacedrive, with 128 test files; glazewm has 2.

The proof: [spacedriveapp/spacedrive's code at commit 11523b2](https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive/tree/11523b224d1422d98def9a1c0f99e89fafada00d)

### Which was updated more recently, glazewm or spacedrive?

spacedrive: its last push was on November 6, 2026, and glazewm's on June 20, 2026.

The proof: [spacedriveapp/spacedrive's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, glazewm or spacedrive?

spacedrive: an AI signed 6.3% of its commits, with Cursor and Claude Code; in glazewm, 0.2%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in spacedriveapp/spacedrive](https://seerepo.com/r/spacedriveapp/spacedrive/ai)

## Sources

- glzr-io/glazewm: Read on November 10, 2026, at commit 5709ad0 (https://github.com/glzr-io/glazewm/tree/5709ad0a3c7c386bbc3e38166a865ffc12937515)
- spacedriveapp/spacedrive: Read on November 6, 2026, at commit 11523b2 (https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive/tree/11523b224d1422d98def9a1c0f99e89fafada00d)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.