Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/go-gitea/gitea/vs/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/go-gitea/gitea/vs/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler.md
Description: gitea and MediaCrawler share 3 technologies: Vite, Redis, and Postgres. gitea is written in Go and MediaCrawler in Python.

# gitea vs MediaCrawler

gitea and MediaCrawler share 3 technologies: Vite, Redis, and Postgres. gitea is written in Go and MediaCrawler in Python.

- [go-gitea/gitea](https://seerepo.com/r/go-gitea/gitea): Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
- [NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler](https://seerepo.com/r/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler): 小红书笔记 | 评论爬虫、抖音视频 | 评论爬虫、快手视频 | 评论爬虫、B 站视频 ｜ 评论爬虫、微博帖子 ｜ 评论爬虫、百度贴吧帖子 ｜ 百度贴吧评论回复爬虫  | 知乎问答文章｜评论爬虫

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Vite, Redis, Postgres
- Only in gitea: Vue, GitHub
- Only in MediaCrawler: React, FastAPI, MongoDB

## Side by side

| | gitea | MediaCrawler |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 563,881 lines written, 2,822 code files | 40,863 lines written, 176 code files |
| Who writes it | 1.5% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Codex | 2.7% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Codex |
| Activity | Last push October 28, 2026, 20,814 commits, 58,737 stars | Last push October 27, 2026, 661 commits, 68,755 stars |
| Tests | 1,187 test files. 47.5% of its code files have a test that imports them | 39 test files. 27.8% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, gitea or MediaCrawler?

gitea, with 563,881 lines written in 2,822 code files; MediaCrawler has 40,863 in 176.

The proof: [go-gitea/gitea's code at commit a4ff1dc](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/tree/a4ff1dcac76943f30531a61b8aaa8caf26fb264a)

### Which has more GitHub stars, gitea or MediaCrawler?

MediaCrawler, with 68,755 stars; gitea has 58,737.

The proof: [NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler on GitHub](https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler)

### Which has more tests, gitea or MediaCrawler?

gitea, with 1,187 test files; MediaCrawler has 39.

The proof: [go-gitea/gitea's code at commit a4ff1dc](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/tree/a4ff1dcac76943f30531a61b8aaa8caf26fb264a)

### Which was updated more recently, gitea or MediaCrawler?

gitea: its last push was on October 28, 2026, and MediaCrawler's on October 27, 2026.

The proof: [go-gitea/gitea's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, gitea or MediaCrawler?

MediaCrawler: an AI signed 2.7% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in gitea, 1.5%.

## Sources

- go-gitea/gitea: Read on October 28, 2026, at commit a4ff1dc (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/tree/a4ff1dcac76943f30531a61b8aaa8caf26fb264a)
- NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler: Read on October 27, 2026, at commit 68d9ef1 (https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler/tree/68d9ef1c1da22eab75940dfd7cec259907006538)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.