Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/krillinai/OpenCreator/vs/ruvnet/ruflo Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/krillinai/OpenCreator/vs/ruvnet/ruflo.md Description: OpenCreator and ruflo share 10 technologies: SQLite, MCP, Vite, React, react-router-dom, sharp, marked, yaml, Zod, and Lucide. Both are written in TypeScript. # OpenCreator vs ruflo OpenCreator and ruflo share 10 technologies: SQLite, MCP, Vite, React, react-router-dom, sharp, marked, yaml, Zod, and Lucide. Both are written in TypeScript. - [krillinai/OpenCreator](https://seerepo.com/r/krillinai/OpenCreator): Formerly KrillinAI, VideoTranslation and Dubbing Tool for 120+ Languages. Open-source AI workspace for creators, powered by Codex. Video downloader, video translation, create videos, images, audios, and edits with Agents in one place. For your Social Media like YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, etc. - [ruvnet/ruflo](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/ruflo): 🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated ## What they share and what sets them apart - In common: SQLite, MCP, Vite, React, react-router-dom, sharp, marked, yaml, Zod, Lucide - Only in OpenCreator: Gin, Fastify, Electron, go-openai, github.com/go-ego/gse, go.uber.org/zap, github.com/aliyun/alibaba-cloud-sdk-go, Cheerio, pdf-parse, pdfkit, fontkit, CodeMirror, react-colorful, react-virtuoso, remotion - Only in ruflo: Express, sql.js, @ruvector/core, Google Cloud, Svelte, SvelteKit, Hono, MongoDB, bson-objectid, Postgres, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Tokio, Supabase, @metaharness/router, js-yaml, jose, Tailwind CSS, bits-ui, web-haptics, openid-client, @huggingface/hub, katex, @resvg/resvg-js, file-type, handlebars, highlight.js, htmlparser2, isomorphic-dompurify, parquetjs, satori, satori-html, pino, prom-client, helmet, aimds-core, agentic-flow, Ajv, tracing, @xenova/transformers, ruvector, agentdb, hmac, @ruvector/sona, @ruvector/attention, @cognitum-one/sdk, @ruvector/ruvllm, bcryptjs, class-variance-authority, next-themes, tailwind-merge, Radix UI, cmdk, embla-carousel-react, input-otp, React Hook Form, react-day-picker, react-resizable-panels, reactflow, recharts, sonner, vaul ## Side by side | | OpenCreator | ruflo | |---|---|---| | Size | 368,579 lines written, 746 code files | 1,168,444 lines written, 2,517 code files | | Who writes it | 8.8% of its commits signed by AI. With Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor | 35.4% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Codex | | Activity | Last push November 8, 2026, 831 commits, 14,247 stars | Last push November 9, 2026, 9,172 commits, 81,322 stars | | Tests | 644 test files. 74.3% of its code files have a test that imports them | 1,902 test files. 50.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | - Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests. - Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch. - Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it. - Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports. ## Frequently asked questions ### Which is bigger, OpenCreator or ruflo? ruflo, with 1,168,444 lines written; OpenCreator has 368,579. The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit 29be054](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/tree/29be054e85636b61788f3955d0bd4d0bcbcfe3f6) ### Which has more GitHub stars, OpenCreator or ruflo? ruflo, with 81,322 stars; OpenCreator has 14,247. The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo) ### Which has more tests, OpenCreator or ruflo? ruflo, with 1,902 test files; OpenCreator has 644. The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit 29be054](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/tree/29be054e85636b61788f3955d0bd4d0bcbcfe3f6) ### Which was updated more recently, OpenCreator or ruflo? ruflo: its last push was on November 9, 2026, and OpenCreator's on November 8, 2026. The proof: [ruvnet/ruflo's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/commits) ### Which has more commits signed by AI, OpenCreator or ruflo? ruflo: an AI signed 35.4% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in OpenCreator, 8.8%. The proof: [the commits each tool signed in ruvnet/ruflo](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/ruflo/ai) ## Sources - krillinai/OpenCreator: Read on November 9, 2026, at commit 983a0bf (https://github.com/krillinai/OpenCreator/tree/983a0bfa003bb6939703dc24df47eb3f7d98a883) - ruvnet/ruflo: Read on November 9, 2026, at commit 29be054 (https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo/tree/29be054e85636b61788f3955d0bd4d0bcbcfe3f6) ## What is your repo built with? Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.