Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/mengxi-ream/read-frog/vs/paperclipai/paperclip
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/mengxi-ream/read-frog/vs/paperclipai/paperclip.md
Description: read-frog and paperclip share 17 technologies: Vite, React, Anthropic, OpenAI, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Base UI, motion, CodeMirror, dnd-kit, cmdk, Radix UI, Better Auth, ai, ai-sdk, react-markdown, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript.

# read-frog vs paperclip

read-frog and paperclip share 17 technologies: Vite, React, Anthropic, OpenAI, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Base UI, motion, CodeMirror, dnd-kit, cmdk, Radix UI, Better Auth, ai, ai-sdk, react-markdown, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript.

- [mengxi-ream/read-frog](https://seerepo.com/r/mengxi-ream/read-frog): 🐸 Read Frog - Open-source AI language learning & flashcards, an Immersive Translate alternative | 🐸 陪读蛙 - 开源 AI 语言学习与闪词卡，沉浸式翻译替代
- [paperclipai/paperclip](https://seerepo.com/r/paperclipai/paperclip): The open-source app everyone uses to manage agents at work

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Vite, React, Anthropic, OpenAI, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, Base UI, motion, CodeMirror, dnd-kit, cmdk, Radix UI, Better Auth, ai, ai-sdk, react-markdown, Zod
- Only in read-frog: React Router, dexie, Hugging Face, Moonshot AI, Perplexity, PostHog, WXT, @fontsource-variable/inter, cn, postcss-value-parser, @tanstack/react-form, uiw, headless-tree, react-rnd, react-error-boundary, Iconify, @tabler/icons-react, @remixicon/react, ai-sdk-ollama, entities, defuddle, @t3-oss/env-core
- Only in paperclip: Express, Postgres, embedded-postgres, MCP, Google, aws-sdk-s3, AWS S3, Tokio, Sentry, Svix, react-router-dom, @clack/prompts, Drizzle, acpx, Cursor, aws-sdk-sts, hmac, aws-sdk-bedrockagentcore, remark-gfm, jsonschema, Ajv, @boxd-sh/sdk, Cloudflare, @daytonaio/sdk, e2b, @kubernetes/client-node, novita-sandbox, three, Vercel, chat, OpenRouter, sharp, dompurify, ajv-formats, opentelemetry, pino, pino-http, tailwind-merge, @mdxeditor/editor, lexical, @lezer/highlight, Mermaid, react-resizable-panels, xterm, Lucide, @assistant-ui/react, @spekoai/client, mdast-util-from-markdown, yaml

## Side by side

| | read-frog | paperclip |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 357,890 lines written, 1,110 code files | 3,556,913 lines written, 5,493 code files |
| Who writes it | 25.3% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot, and CodeRabbit | 26.5% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot |
| Activity | Last push November 13, 2026, 1,337 commits, 10,418 stars | Last push November 12, 2026, 7,243 commits, 113,227 stars |
| Tests | 580 test files. 41.8% of its code files have a test that imports them | 6,093 test files. 62.7% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, read-frog or paperclip?

paperclip, with 3,556,913 lines written; read-frog has 357,890.

The proof: [paperclipai/paperclip's code at commit 51d7764](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/tree/51d77648bc62c2f05fdf377df1b35b1673da3b1b)

### Which has more GitHub stars, read-frog or paperclip?

paperclip, with 113,227 stars; read-frog has 10,418.

The proof: [paperclipai/paperclip on GitHub](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip)

### Which has more tests, read-frog or paperclip?

paperclip, with 6,093 test files; read-frog has 580.

The proof: [paperclipai/paperclip's code at commit 51d7764](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/tree/51d77648bc62c2f05fdf377df1b35b1673da3b1b)

### Which was updated more recently, read-frog or paperclip?

read-frog: its last push was on November 13, 2026, and paperclip's on November 12, 2026.

The proof: [mengxi-ream/read-frog's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/mengxi-ream/read-frog/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, read-frog or paperclip?

paperclip: an AI signed 26.5% of its commits, with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot; in read-frog, 25.3%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in paperclipai/paperclip](https://seerepo.com/r/paperclipai/paperclip/ai)

## Sources

- mengxi-ream/read-frog: Read on November 13, 2026, at commit 01eb03a (https://github.com/mengxi-ream/read-frog/tree/01eb03a5dc821178b2a5c0617090e4e92ccdd049)
- paperclipai/paperclip: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit 51d7764 (https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/tree/51d77648bc62c2f05fdf377df1b35b1673da3b1b)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.