Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/vs/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/vs/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT.md
Description: OCRmyPDF and AutoGPT share 5 technologies: Rich, fpdf2, pillow, pypdfium2, and Pydantic. Both are written in Python.

# OCRmyPDF vs AutoGPT

OCRmyPDF and AutoGPT share 5 technologies: Rich, fpdf2, pillow, pypdfium2, and Pydantic. Both are written in Python.

- [ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF](https://seerepo.com/r/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF): OCRmyPDF adds an OCR text layer to scanned PDF files, allowing them to be searched
- [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT](https://seerepo.com/r/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT): AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Rich, fpdf2, pillow, pypdfium2, Pydantic
- Only in OCRmyPDF: pdfminer.six, pikepdf, uharfbuzz
- Only in AutoGPT: FastAPI, uvicorn, hypercorn, psycopg2-binary, pymssql, pymysql, graphiti-core, Redis, gcloud-aio-storage, pika, falkordb, aio-pika, expiringdict, pinecone, Postgres, pyarrow, Stripe, OpenAI, Sentry, Claude, Anthropic, Replicate, PostHog, Todoist, Google, ElevenLabs, Google Maps, AIOHTTP, React, Next.js, dexie, prompt-toolkit, prisma, SQLAlchemy, cryptography, pyjwt, bcrypt, google-auth-oauthlib, en-core-web-sm, firecrawl-py, mem0ai, tavily-python, autogpt-libs, e2b, typesafe-sdk, exa-py, tiktoken, groq, e2b-code-interpreter, langfuse, rank-bm25, gtts, Ollama, spaCy, stagehand, markdown-it-py, moviepy, beautifulsoup4, agentmail, jinja2, postmarker, html2text, bleach, feedparser, gravitas-md2gdocs, openpyxl, pylatexenc, pypdf, python-docx, youtube-transcript-api, yt-dlp, jsonschema, demjson3, prometheus-client, boto3, docker, prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator, psutil, class-variance-authority, geist, next-themes, Tailwind CSS, tailwind-merge, Framer, React Hook Form, Radix UI, sonner, recharts, use-stick-to-bottom, @tanstack/react-virtual, canvas-confetti, vaul, @rjsf/core, cmdk, @ferrucc-io/emoji-picker, boring-avatars, embla-carousel-react, motion, react-currency-input-field, react-day-picker, react-force-graph-2d, react-window, hugeicons, twemoji, Better Auth, bcryptjs, jose, ai, @ai-sdk/react, react-markdown, remark-gfm, streamdown, rehype-katex, shiki, highlight.js, katex, rehype-autolink-headings, rehype-highlight, rehype-slug, remark-math, rjsf, Zod, @hookform/resolvers

## Side by side

| | OCRmyPDF | AutoGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 50,888 lines written, 94 code files | 1,697,634 lines written, 4,331 code files |
| Who writes it | 2% of its commits signed by AI. With Aider and Claude Code | 16.8% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, CodeRabbit, Mistral Vibe, Factory, Codex, Devin, and Gemini CLI |
| Activity | Last push October 25, 2026, 4,300 commits, 35,254 stars | Last push November 4, 2026, 9,582 commits, 187,891 stars |
| Tests | 97 test files. 64.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | 2,983 test files. 53.9% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, OCRmyPDF or AutoGPT?

AutoGPT, with 1,697,634 lines written; OCRmyPDF has 50,888.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's code at commit 13ac38c](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/tree/13ac38c5b6583bd01b0a6142b0060fc03e102b6e)

### Which has more GitHub stars, OCRmyPDF or AutoGPT?

AutoGPT, with 187,891 stars; OCRmyPDF has 35,254.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT on GitHub](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)

### Which has more tests, OCRmyPDF or AutoGPT?

AutoGPT, with 2,983 test files; OCRmyPDF has 97.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's code at commit 13ac38c](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/tree/13ac38c5b6583bd01b0a6142b0060fc03e102b6e)

### Which was updated more recently, OCRmyPDF or AutoGPT?

AutoGPT: its last push was on November 4, 2026, and OCRmyPDF's on October 25, 2026.

The proof: [Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, OCRmyPDF or AutoGPT?

AutoGPT: an AI signed 16.8% of its commits, with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, CodeRabbit, Mistral Vibe, Factory, Codex, Devin, and Gemini CLI; in OCRmyPDF, 2%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT](https://seerepo.com/r/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/ai)

## Sources

- ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF: Read on November 7, 2026, at commit b457e9e (https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/tree/b457e9efa68c3a46be2470ffb222ed1bccc4dcbc)
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT: Read on November 4, 2026, at commit 13ac38c (https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/tree/13ac38c5b6583bd01b0a6142b0060fc03e102b6e)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.
