Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/quickwit-oss/quickwit/vs/ruvnet/RuView
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/quickwit-oss/quickwit/vs/ruvnet/RuView.md
Description: quickwit and RuView share 11 technologies: Tokio, tower, Vite, React, tabled, indicatif, tracing, OpenTelemetry, tracing-subscriber, opentelemetry-otlp, and opentelemetry-appender-tracing. Both are written in Rust.

# quickwit vs RuView

quickwit and RuView share 11 technologies: Tokio, tower, Vite, React, tabled, indicatif, tracing, OpenTelemetry, tracing-subscriber, opentelemetry-otlp, and opentelemetry-appender-tracing. Both are written in Rust.

- [quickwit-oss/quickwit](https://seerepo.com/r/quickwit-oss/quickwit): Cloud-native OSS search engine for observability
- [ruvnet/RuView](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/RuView): π RuView turns commodity WiFi signals into real-time spatial intelligence, vital sign monitoring, and presence detection — all without a single pixel of video.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Tokio, tower, Vite, React, tabled, indicatif, tracing, OpenTelemetry, tracing-subscriber, opentelemetry-otlp, opentelemetry-appender-tracing
- Only in quickwit: aws-sdk-s3, rdkafka, sqlx, aws-sdk-kinesis, lru, aws-sdk-sqs, mini-moka, opendal, azure_storage, azure_storage_blobs, pulsar, quick_cache, AWS S3, Google, Kafka, warp, React Router, dialoguer, sea-query, azure_identity, google-cloud-auth, reqsign-core, prometheus, metrics, tracing-opentelemetry, aws-sdk-lambda, aws-runtime, azure_core, console-subscriber, env_logger, google-cloud-googleapis, metrics-exporter-prometheus, @emotion/styled, MUI, monaco-editor, react-number-format, Swagger, @mui/icons-material
- Only in RuView: Tauri, axum, FastAPI, aiosqlite, asyncpg, Celery, kombu, psycopg2-binary, sqlx-postgres, sqlx-sqlite, Redis, Postgres, SQLite, rumqttc-v4-next, sqlx-core, AIOHTTP, uvicorn, wasmtime, Lit, react-native, react-navigation, Expo, @react-native-async-storage/async-storage, @tauri-apps/api, console, matplotlib, Rich, three, Gradio, tauri-plugin-dialog, SQLAlchemy, alembic, ed25519-dalek, hmac, jsonwebtoken, python-jose, srp, hkdf, passlib, burn-cuda, burn-train, burn-wgpu, scikit-learn, torchvision, torch, candle-core, candle-nn, tch, burn-core, burn-ndarray, burn-nn, ort, safetensors, pillow, csv, minijinja, jsonschema, marshmallow, Pydantic, prometheus-client, structlog, psutil, log, @metaharness/router, react-native-reanimated, react-native-svg, react-native-webview, react-native-gesture-handler, react-native-safe-area-context, @expo/vector-icons

## Side by side

| | quickwit | RuView |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 320,267 lines written, 645 code files | 586,312 lines written, 1,195 code files |
| Who writes it | 2% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code and Cursor | 15.1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot |
| Activity | Last push November 11, 2026, 3,905 commits, 11,787 stars | Last push November 12, 2026, 1,434 commits, 104,087 stars |
| Tests | 60 test files. 19.2% of its code files have a test that imports them | 379 test files. 15.9% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, quickwit or RuView?

RuView, with 586,312 lines written; quickwit has 320,267.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView's code at commit ce8d296](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/tree/ce8d296c98083528ef75f445f7e7c7e3c7b9ce84)

### Which has more GitHub stars, quickwit or RuView?

RuView, with 104,087 stars; quickwit has 11,787.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView)

### Which has more tests, quickwit or RuView?

RuView, with 379 test files; quickwit has 60.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView's code at commit ce8d296](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/tree/ce8d296c98083528ef75f445f7e7c7e3c7b9ce84)

### Which was updated more recently, quickwit or RuView?

RuView: its last push was on November 12, 2026, and quickwit's on November 11, 2026.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, quickwit or RuView?

RuView: an AI signed 15.1% of its commits, with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot; in quickwit, 2%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in ruvnet/RuView](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/RuView/ai)

## Sources

- quickwit-oss/quickwit: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit ea02864 (https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit/tree/ea02864a8b388b68d3a1a17602a6aba18ce592bc)
- ruvnet/RuView: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit ce8d296 (https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/tree/ce8d296c98083528ef75f445f7e7c7e3c7b9ce84)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.