Source: https://seerepo.com/compare/ruvnet/RuView/vs/zhouxiaoka/autoclip
Markdown source: https://seerepo.com/compare/ruvnet/RuView/vs/zhouxiaoka/autoclip.md
Description: RuView and autoclip share 17 technologies: Tauri, FastAPI, Celery, Redis, Tokio, AIOHTTP, uvicorn, React, Vite, @tauri-apps/api, SQLAlchemy, alembic, python-jose, passlib, pillow, Pydantic, and psutil. RuView is written in Rust and autoclip in Python.

# RuView vs autoclip

RuView and autoclip share 17 technologies: Tauri, FastAPI, Celery, Redis, Tokio, AIOHTTP, uvicorn, React, Vite, @tauri-apps/api, SQLAlchemy, alembic, python-jose, passlib, pillow, Pydantic, and psutil. RuView is written in Rust and autoclip in Python.

- [ruvnet/RuView](https://seerepo.com/r/ruvnet/RuView): π RuView turns commodity WiFi signals into real-time spatial intelligence, vital sign monitoring, and presence detection — all without a single pixel of video.
- [zhouxiaoka/autoclip](https://seerepo.com/r/zhouxiaoka/autoclip): AutoClip｜一个链接，一键出片。开源 AI 视频剪辑桌面工具，将播客、访谈、课程等长视频自动剪成短视频，生成字幕、封面和发布文案，适配抖音、小红书、TikTok、Reels 与 YouTube Shorts。Open-source AI video clipping & content repurposing.

## What they share and what sets them apart

- In common: Tauri, FastAPI, Celery, Redis, Tokio, AIOHTTP, uvicorn, React, Vite, @tauri-apps/api, SQLAlchemy, alembic, python-jose, passlib, pillow, Pydantic, psutil
- Only in RuView: axum, aiosqlite, asyncpg, kombu, psycopg2-binary, sqlx-postgres, sqlx-sqlite, Postgres, SQLite, rumqttc-v4-next, sqlx-core, tower, wasmtime, Lit, react-native, react-navigation, Expo, @react-native-async-storage/async-storage, console, matplotlib, Rich, three, Gradio, indicatif, tabled, tauri-plugin-dialog, ed25519-dalek, hmac, jsonwebtoken, srp, hkdf, burn-cuda, burn-train, burn-wgpu, scikit-learn, torchvision, torch, candle-core, candle-nn, tch, burn-core, burn-ndarray, burn-nn, ort, safetensors, csv, minijinja, jsonschema, marshmallow, prometheus-client, structlog, tracing, tracing-subscriber, log, OpenTelemetry, opentelemetry-appender-tracing, opentelemetry-otlp, @metaharness/router, react-native-reanimated, react-native-svg, react-native-webview, react-native-gesture-handler, react-native-safe-area-context, @expo/vector-icons
- Only in autoclip: OpenAI, Sentry, Google, starlette, react-router-dom, PostHog, cryptography, dashscope, MCP, pysrt, yt-dlp, qrcode, Tailwind CSS, antd, @tauri-apps/plugin-notification, react-beautiful-dnd, Ant Design, tauri-apps, tauri-plugin-notification

## Side by side

| | RuView | autoclip |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 586,312 lines written, 1,195 code files | 213,136 lines written, 527 code files |
| Who writes it | 15.1% of its commits signed by AI. With Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot | 46.9% of its commits signed by AI. With Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex |
| Activity | Last push November 12, 2026, 1,434 commits, 104,087 stars | Last push November 10, 2026, 1,045 commits, 10,399 stars |
| Tests | 379 test files. 15.9% of its code files have a test that imports them | 433 test files. 51.8% of its code files have a test that imports them |

- Size: Lines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
- Who writes it: A commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
- Activity: From GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
- Tests: The files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is bigger, RuView or autoclip?

RuView, with 586,312 lines written; autoclip has 213,136.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView's code at commit ce8d296](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/tree/ce8d296c98083528ef75f445f7e7c7e3c7b9ce84)

### Which has more GitHub stars, RuView or autoclip?

RuView, with 104,087 stars; autoclip has 10,399.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView)

### Which has more tests, RuView or autoclip?

autoclip, with 433 test files; RuView has 379.

The proof: [zhouxiaoka/autoclip's code at commit cd8e6be](https://github.com/zhouxiaoka/autoclip/tree/cd8e6bed18d87a81273d48bcd165751708ac715c)

### Which was updated more recently, RuView or autoclip?

RuView: its last push was on November 12, 2026, and autoclip's on November 10, 2026.

The proof: [ruvnet/RuView's commits on GitHub](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/commits)

### Which has more commits signed by AI, RuView or autoclip?

autoclip: an AI signed 46.9% of its commits, with Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex; in RuView, 15.1%.

The proof: [the commits each tool signed in zhouxiaoka/autoclip](https://seerepo.com/r/zhouxiaoka/autoclip/ai)

## Sources

- ruvnet/RuView: Read on November 12, 2026, at commit ce8d296 (https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/tree/ce8d296c98083528ef75f445f7e7c7e3c7b9ce84)
- zhouxiaoka/autoclip: Read on November 13, 2026, at commit cd8e6be (https://github.com/zhouxiaoka/autoclip/tree/cd8e6bed18d87a81273d48bcd165751708ac715c)

## What is your repo built with?

Any public repo, with no account: https://seerepo.com/r/owner/repo/built, with the owner and name it has on GitHub.