cherry-studio vs reader

cherry-studio and reader share 6 technologies: Vite, React, Lucide, htmlparser2, fast-xml-parser, and pdfjs-dist. Both are written in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

CherryHQ

cherry-studio

Your AI workspace for models, agents, and productivity.

TypeScript53.5kRead on November 13, 2026, at commit 93870b1What is cherry-studio built with?

Only in cherry-studio

In common

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
cherry-studio1,761,996 lines written6,246 code files
reader89,233 lines written379 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
cherry-studio11.9% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Factory, Jules, Amp, Qwen Code, and Codex
reader30.8% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
cherry-studioLast push November 13, 202610,238 commits53,467 stars
readerLast push November 12, 2026321 commits11,094 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
cherry-studio3,256 test files47.2% of its code files have a test that imports them
reader229 test files68.9% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, cherry-studio or reader?
cherry-studio, with 1,761,996 lines written; reader has 89,233.

The proof: CherryHQ/cherry-studio's code at commit 93870b1

Which has more GitHub stars, cherry-studio or reader?
cherry-studio, with 53,467 stars; reader has 11,094.

The proof: CherryHQ/cherry-studio on GitHub

Which has more tests, cherry-studio or reader?
cherry-studio, with 3,256 test files; reader has 229.

The proof: CherryHQ/cherry-studio's code at commit 93870b1

Which was updated more recently, cherry-studio or reader?
cherry-studio: its last push was on November 13, 2026, and reader's on November 12, 2026.

The proof: CherryHQ/cherry-studio's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, cherry-studio or reader?
reader: an AI signed 30.8% of its commits, with Claude Code; in cherry-studio, 11.9%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in hectorqin/reader

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →