Compare

screenshot-to-code vs agno

screenshot-to-code and agno share 5 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

abi

screenshot-to-code

Drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue)

Python80.9kRead on October 29, 2026, at commit a813977What is screenshot-to-code built with?

In common

Only in agno

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
screenshot-to-code40,106 lines written174 code files
agno1,257,682 lines written3,692 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
screenshot-to-code18.5% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Sweep, Cursor, and Codex
agno5.2% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Amp, Devin, and Aider
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
screenshot-to-codeLast push October 27, 20261,289 commits80,882 stars
agnoLast push October 31, 20265,799 commits42,990 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
screenshot-to-code51 test files34.5% of its code files have a test that imports them
agno1,640 test files0.5% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, screenshot-to-code or agno?
agno, with 1,257,682 lines written in 3,692 code files; screenshot-to-code has 40,106 in 174.

The proof: agno-agi/agno's code at commit a9ea2b4

Which has more GitHub stars, screenshot-to-code or agno?
screenshot-to-code, with 80,882 stars; agno has 42,990.

The proof: abi/screenshot-to-code on GitHub

Which has more tests, screenshot-to-code or agno?
agno, with 1,640 test files; screenshot-to-code has 51.

The proof: agno-agi/agno's code at commit a9ea2b4

Which was updated more recently, screenshot-to-code or agno?
agno: its last push was on October 31, 2026, and screenshot-to-code's on October 27, 2026.

The proof: agno-agi/agno's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, screenshot-to-code or agno?
screenshot-to-code: an AI signed 18.5% of its commits, with Claude Code, Sweep, Cursor, and Codex; in agno, 5.2%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in abi/screenshot-to-code

What is your repo built with?

Paste your public repo and see it drawn.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →