Compare

screenshot-to-code vs OpenViking

screenshot-to-code and OpenViking share 5 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

abi

screenshot-to-code

Drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue)

Python80.9kRead on October 29, 2026, at commit a813977What is screenshot-to-code built with?
volcengine

OpenViking

Self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents. Unify Agent Memory, Knowledge RAG and Skills.

Python41.2kRead on October 31, 2026, at commit 3dedeccWhat is OpenViking built with?

In common

Only in OpenViking

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
screenshot-to-code40,106 lines written174 code files
OpenViking1,109,640 lines written1,964 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
screenshot-to-code18.5% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Sweep, Cursor, and Codex
OpenViking8.2% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
screenshot-to-codeLast push October 27, 20261,289 commits80,882 stars
OpenVikingLast push October 31, 20263,051 commits41,225 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
screenshot-to-code51 test files34.5% of its code files have a test that imports them
OpenViking1,353 test files56.6% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, screenshot-to-code or OpenViking?
OpenViking, with 1,109,640 lines written in 1,964 code files; screenshot-to-code has 40,106 in 174.

The proof: volcengine/OpenViking's code at commit 3dedecc

Which has more GitHub stars, screenshot-to-code or OpenViking?
screenshot-to-code, with 80,882 stars; OpenViking has 41,225.

The proof: abi/screenshot-to-code on GitHub

Which has more tests, screenshot-to-code or OpenViking?
OpenViking, with 1,353 test files; screenshot-to-code has 51.

The proof: volcengine/OpenViking's code at commit 3dedecc

Which was updated more recently, screenshot-to-code or OpenViking?
OpenViking: its last push was on October 31, 2026, and screenshot-to-code's on October 27, 2026.

The proof: volcengine/OpenViking's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, screenshot-to-code or OpenViking?
screenshot-to-code: an AI signed 18.5% of its commits, with Claude Code, Sweep, Cursor, and Codex; in OpenViking, 8.2%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in abi/screenshot-to-code

What is your repo built with?

Paste your public repo and see it drawn.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →