Compare

nacos vs Stirling-PDF

nacos and Stirling-PDF share 4 technologies: React, Vite, Spring, and Postgres. nacos is written in Java and Stirling-PDF in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

alibaba

nacos

an easy-to-use dynamic service discovery, configuration and service management platform for building AI cloud native applications.

Java33.5kRead on November 1, 2026, at commit e61ba82What is nacos built with?
Stirling-Tools

Stirling-PDF

#1 PDF Application on GitHub that lets you edit PDFs on any device anywhere

TypeScript95.3kRead on October 29, 2026, at commit 025f763What is Stirling-PDF built with?

In common

Only in Stirling-PDF

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
nacos931,196 lines written3,411 code files
Stirling-PDF1,123,883 lines written4,330 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
nacos4.3% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot
Stirling-PDF2.1% of its commits signed by AIWith GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
nacosLast push October 29, 20265,246 commits33,489 stars
Stirling-PDFLast push October 29, 20265,704 commits95,347 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
nacos2,387 test files82.4% of its code files have a test that imports them
Stirling-PDF2,034 test files48.5% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, nacos or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 1,123,883 lines written in 4,330 code files; nacos has 931,196 in 3,411.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit 025f763

Which has more GitHub stars, nacos or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 95,347 stars; nacos has 33,489.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF on GitHub

Which has more tests, nacos or Stirling-PDF?
nacos, with 2,387 test files; Stirling-PDF has 2,034.

The proof: alibaba/nacos's code at commit e61ba82

Which was updated more recently, nacos or Stirling-PDF?
Both got their last push on October 29, 2026.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, nacos or Stirling-PDF?
nacos: an AI signed 4.3% of its commits, with Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot; in Stirling-PDF, 2.1%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in alibaba/nacos

What is your repo built with?

Paste your public repo and see it drawn.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →