Compare
open-code-review vs caveman
open-code-review and caveman share 3 technologies: net/http, Anthropic, and MCP. Both are written in Go.
What they share and what sets them apart
alibaba
open-code-review
Secure, fast, efficient, battle-tested at Alibaba's scale. Hybrid architecture code review tool: deterministic pipelines + LLM Agent, precise line-level comments, built-in multi-language ruleset (NPE, thread-safety, XSS, SQL injection), OpenAI & Anthropic compatible.
Go48.8kRead on October 28, 2026, at commit 375f64cWhat is open-code-review built with?JuliusBrussee
caveman
🪨 why use many token when few token do trick. Viral skill + proxy for coding agents that cuts 65% of tokens by talking like a caveman.
Go115.8kRead on October 29, 2026, at commit 9b68f7eWhat is caveman built with?In common
Only in open-code-review
Only in caveman
Side by side
open-code-reviewcaveman
SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
open-code-review182,440 lines written316 code files
caveman334,915 lines written435 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
open-code-review2.3% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Warp
caveman74.4% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Cursor
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
open-code-reviewLast push October 22, 2026812 commits48,785 stars
cavemanLast push October 28, 20261,639 commits115,815 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
open-code-review377 test files69.3% of its code files have a test that imports them
caveman711 test files72.6% of its code files have a test that imports them
Frequently asked questions
- Which is bigger, open-code-review or caveman?
- caveman, with 334,915 lines written in 435 code files; open-code-review has 182,440 in 316.
- The proof: JuliusBrussee/caveman's code at commit 9b68f7e
- Which has more GitHub stars, open-code-review or caveman?
- caveman, with 115,815 stars; open-code-review has 48,785.
- The proof: JuliusBrussee/caveman on GitHub
- Which has more tests, open-code-review or caveman?
- caveman, with 711 test files; open-code-review has 377.
- The proof: JuliusBrussee/caveman's code at commit 9b68f7e
- Which was updated more recently, open-code-review or caveman?
- caveman: its last push was on October 28, 2026, and open-code-review's on October 22, 2026.
- The proof: JuliusBrussee/caveman's commits on GitHub
- Which has more commits signed by AI, open-code-review or caveman?
- caveman: an AI signed 74.4% of its commits, with Claude Code and Cursor; in open-code-review, 2.3%.
- The proof: the commits each tool signed in JuliusBrussee/caveman
What is your repo built with?
Paste your public repo and see it drawn.
Free, no account.