edict vs langflow

edict and langflow share 8 technologies: FastAPI, Redis, uvicorn, Vite, React, SQLAlchemy, Pydantic, and Tailwind CSS. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
edict21,760 lines written60 code files
langflow1,446,517 lines written3,937 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
edict5% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code
langflow1.5% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex, and Warp
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
edictLast push September 28, 2026141 commits17,053 stars
langflowLast push November 4, 202617,600 commits156,316 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
edict12 test files1.7% of its code files have a test that imports them
langflow3,083 test files35.1% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, edict or langflow?
langflow, with 1,446,517 lines written; edict has 21,760.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc

Which has more GitHub stars, edict or langflow?
langflow, with 156,316 stars; edict has 17,053.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow on GitHub

Which has more tests, edict or langflow?
langflow, with 3,083 test files; edict has 12.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc

Which was updated more recently, edict or langflow?
langflow: its last push was on November 4, 2026, and edict's on September 28, 2026.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, edict or langflow?
edict: an AI signed 5% of its commits, with Claude Code; in langflow, 1.5%.

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →