SeeRepo
Draw my repo

cc-connect vs Stirling-PDF

cc-connect and Stirling-PDF share 7 technologies: Vite, React, react-router-dom, Tailwind CSS, react-markdown, remark-gfm, and qrcode.react. cc-connect is written in Go and Stirling-PDF in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

chenhg5

cc-connect

Bridge local AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex) to messaging platforms (Feishu/Lark, DingTalk, Slack, Telegram, Discord, LINE, WeChat Work). Chat with your AI dev assistant from anywhere — no public IP required for most platforms.

Go16.3kRead on November 7, 2026, at commit 0df6cbaWhat is cc-connect built with?

Only in cc-connect

In common

Stirling-Tools

Stirling-PDF

#1 PDF Application on GitHub that lets you edit PDFs on any device anywhere

TypeScript95.7kRead on November 4, 2026, at commit 3b4c202What is Stirling-PDF built with?

Only in Stirling-PDF

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
cc-connect257,116 lines written309 code files
Stirling-PDF1,135,977 lines written4,350 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
cc-connect60.3% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, and GitHub Copilot
Stirling-PDF2.1% of its commits signed by AIWith GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
cc-connectLast push November 7, 20261,308 commits16,271 stars
Stirling-PDFLast push November 4, 20265,739 commits95,737 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
cc-connect307 test files59.9% of its code files have a test that imports them
Stirling-PDF2,073 test files48.8% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, cc-connect or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 1,135,977 lines written; cc-connect has 257,116.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit 3b4c202

Which has more GitHub stars, cc-connect or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 95,737 stars; cc-connect has 16,271.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF on GitHub

Which has more tests, cc-connect or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 2,073 test files; cc-connect has 307.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit 3b4c202

Which was updated more recently, cc-connect or Stirling-PDF?
cc-connect: its last push was on November 7, 2026, and Stirling-PDF's on November 4, 2026.

The proof: chenhg5/cc-connect's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, cc-connect or Stirling-PDF?
cc-connect: an AI signed 60.3% of its commits, with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, and GitHub Copilot; in Stirling-PDF, 2.1%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in chenhg5/cc-connect

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →