gh-dash vs DeepSeek-Reasonix

gh-dash and DeepSeek-Reasonix share 3 technologies: charm.land/lipgloss/v2, charm.land/bubbletea/v2, and charm.land/bubbles/v2. Both are written in Go.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

dlvhdr

gh-dash

A rich terminal UI for GitHub that doesn't break your flow.

Go12.7kRead on November 10, 2026, at commit e6752f8What is gh-dash built with?

Only in gh-dash

In common

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
gh-dash36,670 lines written100 code files
DeepSeek-Reasonix1,262,592 lines written4,046 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
gh-dash0.3% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code
DeepSeek-Reasonix8.5% of its commits signed by AIWith Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and Sweep
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
gh-dashLast push October 26, 2026649 commits12,740 stars
DeepSeek-ReasonixLast push November 6, 20269,203 commits36,117 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
gh-dash38 test files75% of its code files have a test that imports them
DeepSeek-Reasonix4,984 test files72% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, gh-dash or DeepSeek-Reasonix?
DeepSeek-Reasonix, with 1,262,592 lines written; gh-dash has 36,670.

The proof: esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix's code at commit 76ed256

Which has more GitHub stars, gh-dash or DeepSeek-Reasonix?
DeepSeek-Reasonix, with 36,117 stars; gh-dash has 12,740.

The proof: esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix on GitHub

Which has more tests, gh-dash or DeepSeek-Reasonix?
DeepSeek-Reasonix, with 4,984 test files; gh-dash has 38.

The proof: esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix's code at commit 76ed256

Which was updated more recently, gh-dash or DeepSeek-Reasonix?
DeepSeek-Reasonix: its last push was on November 6, 2026, and gh-dash's on October 26, 2026.

The proof: esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, gh-dash or DeepSeek-Reasonix?
DeepSeek-Reasonix: an AI signed 8.5% of its commits, with Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and Sweep; in gh-dash, 0.3%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →