eww vs jan

eww and jan share 4 technologies: Tokio, gtk, quick-xml, and log. Both are written in Rust.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
eww14,937 lines written82 code files
jan478,180 lines written949 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
eww0% of its commits signed by AI
jan0.5% of its commits signed by AIWith GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, Factory, Jules, and Aider
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
ewwLast push July 17, 2026706 commits12,749 stars
janLast push November 5, 20267,455 commits45,500 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
eww1 test file9.8% of its code files have a test that imports them
jan527 test files48.9% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, eww or jan?
jan, with 478,180 lines written; eww has 14,937.

The proof: janhq/jan's code at commit 879e6ae

Which has more GitHub stars, eww or jan?
jan, with 45,500 stars; eww has 12,749.

The proof: janhq/jan on GitHub

Which has more tests, eww or jan?
jan, with 527 test files; eww has 1.

The proof: janhq/jan's code at commit 879e6ae

Which was updated more recently, eww or jan?
jan: its last push was on November 5, 2026, and eww's on July 17, 2026.

The proof: janhq/jan's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, eww or jan?
jan: an AI signed 0.5% of its commits, with GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, Factory, Jules, and Aider.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in janhq/jan

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →