Compare
full-stack-fastapi-template vs MediaCrawler
full-stack-fastapi-template and MediaCrawler share 4 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, and Postgres. full-stack-fastapi-template is written in TypeScript and MediaCrawler in Python.
What they share and what sets them apart
fastapi
full-stack-fastapi-template
Full-stack web application template with FastAPI, React, SQLModel, PostgreSQL, Vite, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, FastAPI Cloud, and Docker Compose.
TypeScript46.1kRead on October 28, 2026, at commit f4bcfabWhat is full-stack-fastapi-template built with?NanmiCoder
MediaCrawler
小红书笔记 | 评论爬虫、抖音视频 | 评论爬虫、快手视频 | 评论爬虫、B 站视频 ｜ 评论爬虫、微博帖子 ｜ 评论爬虫、百度贴吧帖子 ｜ 百度贴吧评论回复爬虫 | 知乎问答文章｜评论爬虫
Python68.8kRead on October 27, 2026, at commit 68d9ef1What is MediaCrawler built with?In common
Only in full-stack-fastapi-template
Only in MediaCrawler
- Redis
- MongoDB
Side by side
full-stack-fastapi-templateMediaCrawler
SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
full-stack-fastapi-template13,735 lines written113 code files
MediaCrawler40,863 lines written176 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
full-stack-fastapi-template0% of its commits signed by AI
MediaCrawler2.7% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
full-stack-fastapi-templateLast push October 26, 20261,539 commits46,097 stars
MediaCrawlerLast push October 27, 2026661 commits68,755 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
full-stack-fastapi-template27 test files8% of its code files have a test that imports them
MediaCrawler39 test files27.8% of its code files have a test that imports them
Frequently asked questions
- Which is bigger, full-stack-fastapi-template or MediaCrawler?
- MediaCrawler, with 40,863 lines written in 176 code files; full-stack-fastapi-template has 13,735 in 113.
- The proof: NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler's code at commit 68d9ef1
- Which has more GitHub stars, full-stack-fastapi-template or MediaCrawler?
- MediaCrawler, with 68,755 stars; full-stack-fastapi-template has 46,097.
- The proof: NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler on GitHub
- Which has more tests, full-stack-fastapi-template or MediaCrawler?
- MediaCrawler, with 39 test files; full-stack-fastapi-template has 27.
- The proof: NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler's code at commit 68d9ef1
- Which was updated more recently, full-stack-fastapi-template or MediaCrawler?
- MediaCrawler: its last push was on October 27, 2026, and full-stack-fastapi-template's on October 26, 2026.
- The proof: NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler's commits on GitHub
- Which has more commits signed by AI, full-stack-fastapi-template or MediaCrawler?
- MediaCrawler: an AI signed 2.7% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex.
What is your repo built with?
Paste your public repo and see it drawn.
Free, no account.