Compare

full-stack-fastapi-template vs Stirling-PDF

full-stack-fastapi-template and Stirling-PDF share 4 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, and Postgres. Both are written in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

fastapi

full-stack-fastapi-template

Full-stack web application template with FastAPI, React, SQLModel, PostgreSQL, Vite, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, FastAPI Cloud, and Docker Compose.

TypeScript46.1kRead on October 28, 2026, at commit f4bcfabWhat is full-stack-fastapi-template built with?
Stirling-Tools

Stirling-PDF

#1 PDF Application on GitHub that lets you edit PDFs on any device anywhere

TypeScript95.3kRead on October 29, 2026, at commit 96ee014What is Stirling-PDF built with?

In common

Only in full-stack-fastapi-template

Only in Stirling-PDF

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
full-stack-fastapi-template13,735 lines written113 code files
Stirling-PDF1,114,394 lines written4,302 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
full-stack-fastapi-template0% of its commits signed by AI
Stirling-PDF2.1% of its commits signed by AIWith GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
full-stack-fastapi-templateLast push October 26, 20261,539 commits46,097 stars
Stirling-PDFLast push October 29, 20265,694 commits95,274 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
full-stack-fastapi-template27 test files8% of its code files have a test that imports them
Stirling-PDF2,014 test files48.3% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, full-stack-fastapi-template or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 1,114,394 lines written in 4,302 code files; full-stack-fastapi-template has 13,735 in 113.
The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit 96ee014
Which has more GitHub stars, full-stack-fastapi-template or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 95,274 stars; full-stack-fastapi-template has 46,097.
The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF on GitHub
Which has more tests, full-stack-fastapi-template or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 2,014 test files; full-stack-fastapi-template has 27.
The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit 96ee014
Which was updated more recently, full-stack-fastapi-template or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF: its last push was on October 29, 2026, and full-stack-fastapi-template's on October 26, 2026.
The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's commits on GitHub
Which has more commits signed by AI, full-stack-fastapi-template or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF: an AI signed 2.1% of its commits, with GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
The proof: the commits each tool signed in Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF

What is your repo built with?

Paste your public repo and see it drawn.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →