SeeRepo
Draw my repo

codeburn vs ruflo

codeburn and ruflo share 8 technologies: Vite, React, MCP, Tokio, Zod, Tailwind CSS, tailwind-merge, and recharts. Both are written in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

getagentseal

codeburn

Free, local tool to track AI coding token usage and cost across 37 tools and agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini and more), by model, project, and task. npx codeburn

TypeScript11.8kRead on November 12, 2026, at commit 40d5880What is codeburn built with?

Only in codeburn

In common

ruvnet

ruflo

🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated

TypeScript81.5kRead on November 12, 2026, at commit dc25dd9What is ruflo built with?

Only in ruflo

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
codeburn380,040 lines written571 code files
ruflo1,181,633 lines written2,537 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
codeburn4.2% of its commits signed by AIWith Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Warp, and Factory
ruflo35.1% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
codeburnLast push November 9, 20262,117 commits11,773 stars
rufloLast push November 12, 20269,279 commits81,534 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
codeburn627 test files65.1% of its code files have a test that imports them
ruflo1,952 test files51.3% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, codeburn or ruflo?
ruflo, with 1,181,633 lines written; codeburn has 380,040.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit dc25dd9

Which has more GitHub stars, codeburn or ruflo?
ruflo, with 81,534 stars; codeburn has 11,773.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo on GitHub

Which has more tests, codeburn or ruflo?
ruflo, with 1,952 test files; codeburn has 627.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit dc25dd9

Which was updated more recently, codeburn or ruflo?
ruflo: its last push was on November 12, 2026, and codeburn's on November 9, 2026.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, codeburn or ruflo?
ruflo: an AI signed 35.1% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in codeburn, 4.2%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in ruvnet/ruflo

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →