reader vs ruflo

reader and ruflo share 5 technologies: Vite, React, react-router-dom, htmlparser2, and Lucide. Both are written in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

In common

ruvnet

ruflo

🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated

TypeScript81.5kRead on November 12, 2026, at commit dc25dd9What is ruflo built with?

Only in ruflo

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
reader89,233 lines written379 code files
ruflo1,181,633 lines written2,537 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
reader30.8% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code
ruflo35.1% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
readerLast push November 12, 2026321 commits11,094 stars
rufloLast push November 12, 20269,279 commits81,534 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
reader229 test files68.9% of its code files have a test that imports them
ruflo1,952 test files51.3% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, reader or ruflo?
ruflo, with 1,181,633 lines written; reader has 89,233.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit dc25dd9

Which has more GitHub stars, reader or ruflo?
ruflo, with 81,534 stars; reader has 11,094.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo on GitHub

Which has more tests, reader or ruflo?
ruflo, with 1,952 test files; reader has 229.

The proof: ruvnet/ruflo's code at commit dc25dd9

Which was updated more recently, reader or ruflo?
Both got their last push on November 12, 2026.

The proof: hectorqin/reader's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, reader or ruflo?
ruflo: an AI signed 35.1% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in reader, 30.8%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in ruvnet/ruflo

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →