Compare

langflow vs TradingAgents

langflow and TradingAgents share 3 technologies: Rich, cryptography, and LangChain. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

langflow-ai

langflow

Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.

Python156.3kRead on November 4, 2026, at commit 60999ccWhat is langflow built with?
TauricResearch

TradingAgents

TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework

Python120.5kRead on November 4, 2026, at commit 9fa1196What is TradingAgents built with?

In common

  • Rich
  • cryptography
  • LangChain

Only in langflow

Only in TradingAgents

  • langchain-openai
  • LangGraph
  • langchain-anthropic
  • langchain-google-genai
  • markdown-it-py

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
langflow1,446,517 lines written3,937 code files
TradingAgents25,828 lines written67 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
langflow1.5% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex, and Warp
TradingAgents2.1% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
langflowLast push November 4, 202617,600 commits156,316 stars
TradingAgentsLast push November 4, 2026477 commits120,536 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
langflow3,083 test files35.1% of its code files have a test that imports them
TradingAgents90 test files85.1% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, langflow or TradingAgents?
langflow, with 1,446,517 lines written; TradingAgents has 25,828.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc

Which has more GitHub stars, langflow or TradingAgents?
langflow, with 156,316 stars; TradingAgents has 120,536.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow on GitHub

Which has more tests, langflow or TradingAgents?
langflow, with 3,083 test files; TradingAgents has 90.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc

Which was updated more recently, langflow or TradingAgents?
Both got their last push on November 4, 2026.

The proof: TauricResearch/TradingAgents's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, langflow or TradingAgents?
TradingAgents: an AI signed 2.1% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in langflow, 1.5%.

What is your repo built with?

Paste your public repo and see it drawn.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →