Aperant vs cherry-studio
Aperant and cherry-studio share 21 technologies: Vite, React, SQLite, Anthropic, OpenAI, Sentry, MCP, Electron, Tailwind CSS, class-variance-authority, tailwind-merge, Radix UI, dnd-kit, motion, TanStack, Lucide, ai, ai-sdk, OpenRouter, remark-gfm, and Zod. Both are written in TypeScript.
LinkedInWhat they share and what sets them apart
AndyMik90
Aperant
Autonomous multi-session AI coding
TypeScript14.6kRead on November 9, 2026, at commit 20250dbWhat is Aperant built with?Only in Aperant
In common
CherryHQ
cherry-studio
Your AI workspace for models, agents, and productivity.
TypeScript53.3kRead on November 5, 2026, at commit 2292fddWhat is cherry-studio built with?Only in cherry-studio
- lru-cache
dexie
- electron-store
@aws-sdk/lib-storage
sqlite-vec
elysia
- @electron-toolkit/preload
- quickjs-wasi
grammy
- quick-lru
- PostCSS
tiptap
- React Hook Form
react-spinners
- @tanstack/react-virtual
- react-hotkeys-hook
react-error-boundary
echarts
@uiw/react-codemirror
- xyflow
@floating-ui/dom
- virtua
emoji-picker-react
@dagrejs/dagre
- @pierre/highlights
@react-aria/live-announcer
- ansi-to-react
- CodeMirror
- react-player
- Drizzle
earendil-works
tesseract.js
- ollama-ai-provider-v2
partial-json
gpt-tokenizer
unified
- streamdown
- file-type
- unist-util-visit
- remark-parse
- sharp
yaml
markdown-it
- qrcode.react
- turndown
- @firecrawl/anydoc
- dompurify
- htmlparser2
- @napi-rs/canvas
katex
- officeparser
- remove-markdown
- @mozilla/readability
- Cheerio
docx
- fast-xml-parser
- gray-matter
- html-to-image
- html-to-text
- mdast-util-from-markdown
mediabunny
micromark-util-types
- pdf-lib
- pdf-parse
pdfjs-dist
- qrcode
remark-math
- remark-stringify
- word-extractor
@hookform/resolvers
- opentelemetry
winston
winston-daily-rotate-file
- @aiden0z/pptx-renderer
- docx-preview
- exceljs
@ai-sdk/provider-utils
- @lezer/highlight
- cmdk
react-day-picker
react-dropzone
react-resizable-panels
vaul
rehype-parse
- remark-github-blockquote-alert
Side by side
Aperantcherry-studio
SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
Aperant317,392 lines written912 code files
cherry-studio1,744,076 lines written6,114 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
Aperant63.3% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Factory, and CodeRabbit
cherry-studio11.8% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Factory, Jules, Amp, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
AperantLast push June 14, 20261,025 commits14,597 stars
cherry-studioLast push November 5, 20269,918 commits53,285 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
Aperant232 test files24.6% of its code files have a test that imports them
cherry-studio3,190 test files47.1% of its code files have a test that imports them
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, Aperant or cherry-studio?
cherry-studio, with 1,744,076 lines written; Aperant has 317,392.
Which has more GitHub stars, Aperant or cherry-studio?
cherry-studio, with 53,285 stars; Aperant has 14,597.
The proof: CherryHQ/cherry-studio on GitHub
Which has more tests, Aperant or cherry-studio?
cherry-studio, with 3,190 test files; Aperant has 232.
Which was updated more recently, Aperant or cherry-studio?
cherry-studio: its last push was on November 5, 2026, and Aperant's on June 14, 2026.
The proof: CherryHQ/cherry-studio's commits on GitHub
Which has more commits signed by AI, Aperant or cherry-studio?
Aperant: an AI signed 63.3% of its commits, with Claude Code, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Factory, and CodeRabbit; in cherry-studio, 11.8%.
The proof: the commits each tool signed in AndyMik90/Aperant
See inside your code, today.
Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.
Free, no account.
