Compare
MediaCrawler vs Stirling-PDF
MediaCrawler and Stirling-PDF share 4 technologies: React, Vite, FastAPI, and Postgres. MediaCrawler is written in Python and Stirling-PDF in TypeScript.
What they share and what sets them apart
NanmiCoder
MediaCrawler
小红书笔记 | 评论爬虫、抖音视频 | 评论爬虫、快手视频 | 评论爬虫、B 站视频 ｜ 评论爬虫、微博帖子 ｜ 评论爬虫、百度贴吧帖子 ｜ 百度贴吧评论回复爬虫 | 知乎问答文章｜评论爬虫
Python68.8kRead on October 27, 2026, at commit 68d9ef1What is MediaCrawler built with?Stirling-Tools
Stirling-PDF
#1 PDF Application on GitHub that lets you edit PDFs on any device anywhere
TypeScript95.1kRead on October 27, 2026, at commit cd48ccbWhat is Stirling-PDF built with?In common
Only in MediaCrawler
- Redis
- MongoDB
Only in Stirling-PDF
- Spring
- Supabase
- Stripe
AWS S3
PostHog
Side by side
MediaCrawlerStirling-PDF
SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
MediaCrawler40,863 lines written176 code files
Stirling-PDF1,143,405 lines written4,342 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
MediaCrawler2.7% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Codex
Stirling-PDF2.1% of its commits signed by AIWith GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
MediaCrawlerLast push October 27, 2026661 commits68,755 stars
Stirling-PDFLast push October 27, 20265,679 commits95,111 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
MediaCrawler39 test files27.8% of its code files have a test that imports them
Stirling-PDF2,064 test files48.8% of its code files have a test that imports them
Frequently asked questions
- Which is bigger, MediaCrawler or Stirling-PDF?
- Stirling-PDF, with 1,143,405 lines written in 4,342 code files; MediaCrawler has 40,863 in 176.
- The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit cd48ccb
- Which has more GitHub stars, MediaCrawler or Stirling-PDF?
- Stirling-PDF, with 95,111 stars; MediaCrawler has 68,755.
- The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF on GitHub
- Which has more tests, MediaCrawler or Stirling-PDF?
- Stirling-PDF, with 2,064 test files; MediaCrawler has 39.
- The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit cd48ccb
- Which was updated more recently, MediaCrawler or Stirling-PDF?
- Both got their last push on October 27, 2026.
- The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's commits on GitHub
- Which has more commits signed by AI, MediaCrawler or Stirling-PDF?
- MediaCrawler: an AI signed 2.7% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in Stirling-PDF, 2.1%.
What is your repo built with?
Paste your public repo and see it drawn.
Free, no account.