DB-GPT vs langflow

DB-GPT and langflow share 13 technologies: FastAPI, uvicorn, AIOHTTP, React, SQLAlchemy, Pydantic, psutil, Tailwind CSS, reactflow, react-syntax-highlighter, remark-gfm, react-markdown, and rehype-raw. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

eosphoros-ai

DB-GPT

open-source agentic AI data assistant for the next generation of AI + Data products.

Python20.3kRead on November 5, 2026, at commit 9d50d0aWhat is DB-GPT built with?

Only in DB-GPT

In common

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
DB-GPT463,020 lines written2,162 code files
langflow1,446,517 lines written3,937 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
DB-GPT1.6% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor
langflow1.5% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex, and Warp
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
DB-GPTLast push November 4, 20262,574 commits20,262 stars
langflowLast push November 4, 202617,600 commits156,316 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
DB-GPT488 test files13.4% of its code files have a test that imports them
langflow3,083 test files35.1% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, DB-GPT or langflow?
langflow, with 1,446,517 lines written; DB-GPT has 463,020.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc

Which has more GitHub stars, DB-GPT or langflow?
langflow, with 156,316 stars; DB-GPT has 20,262.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow on GitHub

Which has more tests, DB-GPT or langflow?
langflow, with 3,083 test files; DB-GPT has 488.

The proof: langflow-ai/langflow's code at commit 60999cc

Which was updated more recently, DB-GPT or langflow?
Both got their last push on November 4, 2026.

The proof: eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, DB-GPT or langflow?
DB-GPT: an AI signed 1.6% of its commits, with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor; in langflow, 1.5%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →