codeburn vs Stirling-PDF

codeburn and Stirling-PDF share 8 technologies: Vite, React, @tauri-apps/api, Tauri, Tokio, Tailwind CSS, recharts, and tauri-plugin-notification. Both are written in TypeScript.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

getagentseal

codeburn

Free, local tool to track AI coding token usage and cost across 37 tools and agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini and more), by model, project, and task. npx codeburn

TypeScript11.8kRead on November 12, 2026, at commit 40d5880What is codeburn built with?

Only in codeburn

In common

Stirling-Tools

Stirling-PDF

#1 PDF Application on GitHub that lets you edit PDFs on any device anywhere

TypeScript96.4kRead on November 12, 2026, at commit ee8c2b3What is Stirling-PDF built with?

Only in Stirling-PDF

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
codeburn380,040 lines written571 code files
Stirling-PDF1,168,066 lines written4,452 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
codeburn4.2% of its commits signed by AIWith Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Warp, and Factory
Stirling-PDF2.1% of its commits signed by AIWith GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
codeburnLast push November 9, 20262,117 commits11,773 stars
Stirling-PDFLast push November 12, 20265,787 commits96,362 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
codeburn627 test files65.1% of its code files have a test that imports them
Stirling-PDF2,168 test files49.7% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, codeburn or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 1,168,066 lines written; codeburn has 380,040.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit ee8c2b3

Which has more GitHub stars, codeburn or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 96,362 stars; codeburn has 11,773.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF on GitHub

Which has more tests, codeburn or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF, with 2,168 test files; codeburn has 627.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's code at commit ee8c2b3

Which was updated more recently, codeburn or Stirling-PDF?
Stirling-PDF: its last push was on November 12, 2026, and codeburn's on November 9, 2026.

The proof: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, codeburn or Stirling-PDF?
codeburn: an AI signed 4.2% of its commits, with Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Warp, and Factory; in Stirling-PDF, 2.1%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in getagentseal/codeburn

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →