SeeRepo
Draw my repo

llama_index vs AutoGPT

llama_index and AutoGPT share 36 technologies: psycopg2-binary, Redis, pyarrow, falkordb, pinecone, pymysql, ElevenLabs, AIOHTTP, prompt-toolkit, Rich, SQLAlchemy, Google, google-auth-oauthlib, cryptography, pyjwt, firecrawl-py, mem0ai, OpenAI, tavily-python, tiktoken, Ollama, exa-py, langfuse, beautifulsoup4, bleach, pillow, html2text, jinja2, pypdf, youtube-transcript-api, Pydantic, jsonschema, prometheus-client, psutil, boto3, and docker. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

run-llama

llama_index

LlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AI

Python52.8kRead on November 5, 2026, at commit 444fdf0What is llama_index built with?

Only in llama_index

  • starlette
  • aiomysql
  • aiosqlite
  • async-lru
  • asyncpg
  • azure-search-documents
  • azure-storage-blob
  • ibm-db
  • pgvecto-rs
  • pgvector
  • psycopg
  • pyzmq
  • weaviate-client
  • lancedb
  • oracledb
  • DuckDB
  • pymilvus
  • SQLite
  • tablestore
  • chromadb
  • MySQL
  • clickhouse-connect
  • gcsfs
  • pyiceberg
  • pymochow
  • pyobvector
  • s3fs
  • tcvectordb
  • typesense
  • anyio
  • graphql-core
  • tornado
  • Ray
  • soupsieve
  • tinycss2
  • ipywidgets
  • matplotlib-inline
  • matplotlib
  • argon2-cffi
  • azure-identity
  • google-auth-httplib2
  • msal
  • einops
  • guardrails-ai
  • llama-index-core
  • opencv-python
  • PaddlePaddle
  • torch
  • transformers
  • ibm-watsonx-ai
  • cohere
  • LangChain
  • MCP
  • sentence-transformers
  • dashscope
  • fastembed
  • flagembedding
  • nltk
  • sentencepiece
  • litellm
  • ModelScope
  • openvino
  • scikit-learn
  • tritonclient
  • vLLM
  • datasets
  • flashrank
  • hnswlib
  • mlx
  • mlx-lm
  • nomic
  • optimum
  • paddleocr
  • peft
  • presidio-analyzer
  • tokenizers
  • markupsafe
  • mistune
  • nbformat
  • newspaper3k
  • xlrd
  • bs4
  • unstructured
  • defusedxml
  • lxml
  • pymupdf
  • filetype
  • docx2txt
  • markdownify
  • docling
  • lxml-html-clean
  • markitdown
  • nbconvert
  • pdf2image
  • pdfplumber
  • pypdf2
  • tinytag
  • jsonschema-specifications
  • marshmallow
  • referencing
  • rfc3339-validator
  • docling-core
  • annotated-types
  • pydantic-core
  • opentelemetry-api
  • opentelemetry-semantic-conventions
  • python-json-logger
  • Alibaba Cloud
  • OpenTelemetry

In common

Significant-Gravitas

AutoGPT

AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters.

Python187.9kRead on November 4, 2026, at commit 13ac38cWhat is AutoGPT built with?

Only in AutoGPT

Side by side

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.
llama_index473,236 lines written2,055 code files
AutoGPT1,697,634 lines written4,331 code files
Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.
llama_index0.2% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot
AutoGPT16.8% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, CodeRabbit, Mistral Vibe, Factory, Codex, Devin, and Gemini CLI
ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.
llama_indexLast push November 5, 20267,963 commits52,820 stars
AutoGPTLast push November 4, 20269,582 commits187,891 stars
TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.
llama_index1,607 test files46.5% of its code files have a test that imports them
AutoGPT2,983 test files53.9% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, llama_index or AutoGPT?
AutoGPT, with 1,697,634 lines written; llama_index has 473,236.

The proof: Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's code at commit 13ac38c

Which has more GitHub stars, llama_index or AutoGPT?
AutoGPT, with 187,891 stars; llama_index has 52,820.

The proof: Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT on GitHub

Which has more tests, llama_index or AutoGPT?
AutoGPT, with 2,983 test files; llama_index has 1,607.

The proof: Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT's code at commit 13ac38c

Which was updated more recently, llama_index or AutoGPT?
llama_index: its last push was on November 5, 2026, and AutoGPT's on November 4, 2026.

The proof: run-llama/llama_index's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, llama_index or AutoGPT?
AutoGPT: an AI signed 16.8% of its commits, with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, CodeRabbit, Mistral Vibe, Factory, Codex, Devin, and Gemini CLI; in llama_index, 0.2%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →