Pricing Log in Draw my repo

llama_index vs MemoryBear

llama_index and MemoryBear share 53 technologies: starlette, asyncpg, oss2, psycopg, psycopg2-binary, Redis, Neo4j, anyio, AIOHTTP, soupsieve, prompt-toolkit, matplotlib, Rich, SQLAlchemy, cryptography, pyjwt, OpenAI, opencv-python, LangChain, tiktoken, MCP, dashscope, nltk, chonkie, ModelScope, Ollama, scikit-learn, langfuse, beautifulsoup4, markupsafe, webencodings, xlrd, pillow, jinja2, lxml, pymupdf, markdownify, olefile, pdfplumber, pypdf, pypdf2, tika, jsonschema-specifications, marshmallow, referencing, Pydantic, annotated-types, jsonschema, opentelemetry-semantic-conventions, prometheus-client, psutil, boto3, and OpenTelemetry. Both are written in Python.

Read it as markdown

What they share and what sets them apart

run-llama

llama_index

LlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AI

Python52.9kRead on November 13, 2026, at commit baeabbf What is llama_index built with?

Only in llama_index

In common

SuanmoSuanyangTechnology

MemoryBear

MemoryBear Equip AI with human-like memory capability

Python10.2kRead on November 13, 2026, at commit 9ba1071 What is MemoryBear built with?

Only in MemoryBear

Side by side

llama_indexMemoryBear

SizeLines written by people and agents, without generated ones; code files, without tests.

llama_index473,258 lines written2,055 code files

MemoryBear773,759 lines written3,244 code files

Who writes itA commit counts as AI's when it carries its signature: a Co-Authored-By line, its author name or the merge of its branch.

llama_index0.2% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot

MemoryBear0.8% of its commits signed by AIWith Claude Code and Codex

ActivityFrom GitHub and its history, on the day SeeRepo read it.

llama_indexLast push November 11, 20267,967 commits52,885 stars

MemoryBearLast push November 13, 20265,353 commits10,206 stars

TestsThe files that test the code, and the share of code files a test imports.

llama_index1,607 test files46.5% of its code files have a test that imports them

MemoryBear48 test files2.3% of its code files have a test that imports them

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, llama_index or MemoryBear?

MemoryBear, with 773,759 lines written; llama_index has 473,258.

The proof: SuanmoSuanyangTechnology/MemoryBear's code at commit 9ba1071

Which has more GitHub stars, llama_index or MemoryBear?

llama_index, with 52,885 stars; MemoryBear has 10,206.

The proof: run-llama/llama_index on GitHub

Which has more tests, llama_index or MemoryBear?

llama_index, with 1,607 test files; MemoryBear has 48.

The proof: run-llama/llama_index's code at commit baeabbf

Which was updated more recently, llama_index or MemoryBear?

MemoryBear: its last push was on November 13, 2026, and llama_index's on November 11, 2026.

The proof: SuanmoSuanyangTechnology/MemoryBear's commits on GitHub

Which has more commits signed by AI, llama_index or MemoryBear?

MemoryBear: an AI signed 0.8% of its commits, with Claude Code and Codex; in llama_index, 0.2%.

The proof: the commits each tool signed in SuanmoSuanyangTechnology/MemoryBear

See inside your code, today.

Paste your repo and see it drawn, part by part: a medium one in under a minute.

Free, no account.

Or look inside SeeRepo's own →